Reassessment under Section 148A Cannot Proceed on Unverified Shipping Bill Data and PAN Confusion; Matter Remanded for Fresh Consideration: Umesh Chandra Sharma vs. ITO (Delhi HC)

Author
My Tax Expert
02/02/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 15
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe petitioner, Umesh Chandra Sharma, an individual assessee, filed a writ petition challenging a notice dated 06.03.2023 issued under Section 148A(b), an order dated 21.03.2023 passed under Section 1...

Entertainment Tax Subsidy Retained by Multiplex Operators Is Capital Receipt; Purpose Test Applied and Issue Covered by Supreme Court Precedent: PCIT-Central-1 vs. PVR Ltd. (Delhi HC)

Author
My Tax Expert
02/02/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 12
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe Revenue filed a batch of four appeals under Section 260A of the Income-tax Act challenging a common order dated 23.10.2024 passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal for Assessment Years 2008-09,...

Different Floors of Same Property Constitute One Residential House for Section 54F; Reopening Beyond Four Years Invalid Without Failure of Disclosure: PCIT-Central-1 vs. Lata Goel (Delhi HC)

Author
My Tax Expert
02/02/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 21
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe Revenue filed an appeal under Section 260A against the ITAT’s order dated 25.09.2024 for Assessment Year 2011-12. The assessee, Lata Goel, filed her return declaring income of ₹70,87,301 and ...

Block Period under Section 153C to Be Reckoned from Date of Satisfaction Note; AY Falling Outside Ten-Year Block Cannot Be Reopened: PCIT-Central-1 vs. Amol Awasthi (Delhi HC)

Author
My Tax Expert
02/02/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 14
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe Revenue filed an appeal under Section 260A of the Income-tax Act challenging the order dated 13.09.2024 passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal in ITA No. 1343/Del/2024 for Assessment Year 201...

Penalty under Section 271(1)(c) Unsustainable Where Notice Does Not Specify Charge and Issue Is Debatable; No Substantial Question of Law: PCIT-7 vs. Quippo Telecom Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd. (Delhi HC)

Author
My Tax Expert
02/02/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 26
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe Revenue filed an appeal under Section 260A of the Income-tax Act challenging the order dated 06.03.2020 passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal in respect of Assessment Year 2010-11, whereby t...

Commission Income and Subscription Fees from Sale of Journals Not Taxable as Fees for Technical Services; Issue Covered by Binding Precedents: CIT (International Taxation-3) vs. Springer Nature Customer Service Centre GmbH (Delhi HC)

Author
My Tax Expert
02/02/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 22
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe Revenue filed appeals under Section 260A of the Income-tax Act challenging a common order dated 05.07.2024 passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal for Assessment Years 2020-21 and 2021-22. The...

Centralised Marketing and Reservation Support Services Not Taxable as Royalty or Fees for Included Services; Issue Covered by Binding Precedents: CIT-IT-3 vs. Six Continents Hotels Inc. (Delhi HC)

Author
My Tax Expert
02/02/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 14
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe Revenue filed an appeal under Section 260A of the Income-tax Act challenging the order dated 09.05.2024 passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal in favour of Six Continents Hotels Inc. for Asse...

Reassessment Proceedings Barred Post CIRP Approval; Clean Slate Doctrine Applies to Income Tax Dues Not Provided in Resolution Plan: Surya Manufacturing Pvt. Ltd. vs. ACIT (Delhi HC)

Author
My Tax Expert
02/02/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 36
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe petitioner, Surya Manufacturing Private Limited, challenged an order dated 10.04.2024 passed under Section 148A(d) of the Income-tax Act for Assessment Year 2017-18, holding it to be a fit case fo...

Writ Not Entertained Where Effective Appellate Remedy Exists; Jurisdiction under Section 127 Found Valid, Liberty Granted to Pursue Statutory Appeal: Supershine Laundry Systems Pvt. Ltd. vs. DCIT (Delhi HC)

Author
My Tax Expert
02/02/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 17
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe petitioner, Supershine Laundry Systems Private Limited, filed writ petitions challenging reassessment orders dated 20.03.2025 passed under Section 147 of the Income-tax Act for the relevant assess...

Section 148 Notice Issued Beyond Permissible Period After Ashish Agarwal Regime Held Time-Barred; Reassessment Quashed: Saroj Mehndi vs. ITO (Delhi HC)

Author
My Tax Expert
02/02/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 16
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe petitioner, Saroj Mehndi, challenged a notice dated 11.07.2022 issued under Section 148 of the Income-tax Act for Assessment Year 2014-15 on the ground that it was barred by limitation. An earlier...