Facts of the
Case
The petitioner, Surya Manufacturing Private
Limited, challenged an order dated 10.04.2024 passed under Section 148A(d) of
the Income-tax Act for Assessment Year 2017-18, holding it to be a fit case for
issuance of notice under Section 148. The petitioner also challenged the
consequential reassessment proceedings.
The petitioner had undergone Corporate Insolvency
Resolution Process under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016. A resolution
plan was approved by the National Company Law Tribunal on 28.07.2021 under
Section 30 of the IBC, pursuant to which management and control of the
petitioner was taken over by a successful resolution applicant.
The petitioner contended that no provision was made
in the approved resolution plan for any outstanding income tax dues for AY
2017-18 and therefore any attempt to reopen assessment for pre-CIRP periods was
impermissible in law.
Issues
Involved
Whether reassessment proceedings under Sections 148
and 148A could be initiated for pre-CIRP assessment years after approval of a
resolution plan under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, whether income tax
dues not provided for in the resolution plan stood extinguished, and whether
the clean slate doctrine applied to bar reassessment proceedings.
Petitioner’s
Arguments
The petitioner argued that once a resolution plan
is approved by the NCLT, all claims and liabilities arising prior to the
commencement of CIRP which are not part of the resolution plan stand
extinguished. It was contended that reopening of assessment for AY 2017-18
amounted to enforcement of a pre-CIRP claim, which was barred in view of the
clean slate doctrine as laid down by the Supreme Court in Ghanashyam Mishra
& Sons (P) Ltd. v. Edelweiss Asset Reconstruction Co. Ltd. Reliance was
also placed on earlier Delhi High Court decisions in Ireo Fiveriver Pvt. Ltd.
and Asian Colour Coated Ispat Ltd.
Respondent’s
Arguments
The Revenue sought to justify the reassessment
proceedings but fairly conceded that the issue raised by the petitioner was
covered by binding precedents of the Delhi High Court which had applied the
clean slate doctrine to income tax proceedings initiated after approval of
resolution plans under the IBC.
Court Order
/ Findings
The Delhi High Court noted that it was undisputed
that the petitioner’s CIRP had culminated in approval of a resolution plan by
the NCLT on 28.07.2021 and that no income tax dues for AY 2017-18 were provided
for in the plan. The Court held that the issue was squarely covered by its
earlier decisions in Ireo Fiveriver Pvt. Ltd. v. Income Tax Department and
Asian Colour Coated Ispat Ltd. v. ACIT, which followed the Supreme Court ruling
in Ghanashyam Mishra & Sons.
Applying the clean slate doctrine, the Court held
that all pre-CIRP liabilities, including statutory dues such as income tax,
which were not part of the resolution plan stood extinguished. Consequently,
reassessment proceedings initiated for AY 2017-18 were without jurisdiction.
Important
Clarification
The High Court clarified that income tax
authorities cannot reopen or reassess income for pre-CIRP assessment years once
a resolution plan has been approved under the IBC, if such tax dues were not
specifically provided for in the resolution plan. Approval of the resolution
plan grants the successful resolution applicant a clean slate free from past
liabilities.
Final
Outcome
The writ petition was allowed. The order dated
10.04.2024 passed under Section 148A(d) of the Income-tax Act and all
consequential reassessment proceedings initiated in respect of Assessment Year
2017-18 were set aside. All pending applications were disposed of.
Link to
download order https://www.mytaxexpert.co.in/uploads/1769756855_SURYAMANUFACTURINGPRIVATELIMITEDVsASSISTANTCOMMISSIONEROFINCOMETAXORS..pdf
Disclaimer
This content is shared strictly for general
information and knowledge purposes only. Readers should independently verify
the information from reliable sources. It is not intended to provide legal,
professional, or advisory guidance. The author and the organisation disclaim
all liability arising from the use of this content. The material has been
prepared with the assistance of AI tools.
0 Comments
Leave a Comment