Facts of the
Case
The Revenue filed an appeal under Section 260A of
the Income-tax Act challenging the order dated 13.09.2024 passed by the Income
Tax Appellate Tribunal in ITA No. 1343/Del/2024 for Assessment Year 2012-13.
The ITAT order formed part of a common order passed in a batch of seven appeals
filed by the assessee against final assessment orders passed under Sections
144C and 153C read with Section 143(3).
The assessee filed his return of income for AY
2012-13 on 24.09.2012 declaring income of ₹10,03,030, which was processed under
Section 143(1). On 30.06.2019, a search under Section 132 was conducted in the
case of one Sanjay Jain, pursuant to which the assessee was initially treated
as a searched person and notice under Section 153A was issued.
Subsequently, during pendency of proceedings,
information was received regarding a separate search conducted on 30.06.2019 in
the case of Rajeev Saxena. The Assessing Officer of the searched person
recorded a satisfaction note stating that documents seized belonged to or
pertained to the assessee. Thereafter, proceedings under Section 153A were
dropped and notice dated 29.09.2021 was issued to the assessee under Section
153C. The assessment culminated in additions made on a protective basis.
The assessee’s objections before the Dispute
Resolution Panel were rejected and final assessment order dated 30.01.2024 was
passed. The ITAT allowed the assessee’s appeal holding that assumption of
jurisdiction under Section 153C for AY 2012-13 was invalid. Aggrieved, the
Revenue approached the High Court.
Issues
Involved
Whether the block period for assessment under
Section 153C is to be computed from the date of initiation of search or from
the date of recording of the satisfaction note by the Assessing Officer of the
non-searched person, and whether Assessment Year 2012-13 fell outside the
permissible block of ten years.
Petitioner’s
Arguments
The Revenue contended that the ITAT erred in
holding that the block period under Section 153C is to be reckoned from the
date of receipt of seized material and satisfaction note by the Assessing
Officer of the non-searched person. It was argued that the first proviso to
Section 153C dealt only with abatement of proceedings and not with computation
of block period, and that after the Finance Act, 2017 amendment, the block
period under Sections 153A and 153C must be uniformly reckoned from the year of
search.
Respondent’s
Arguments
The assessee supported the order of the ITAT and
submitted that the issue was squarely covered by the Delhi High Court’s earlier
decision in Principal Commissioner of Income Tax-Central-1 vs. Ojjus Medicare
Pvt. Ltd., wherein it was held that the ten-year block under Section 153C must
be computed from the end of the assessment year in which the satisfaction note
is recorded by the Assessing Officer having jurisdiction over the non-searched
person.
Court Order
/ Findings
The Delhi High Court noted that the satisfaction
note under Section 153C in the present case was recorded on 29.09.2021.
Applying the ratio laid down in Ojjus Medicare Pvt. Ltd., the Court held that
the block of ten assessment years must be reckoned from the end of Assessment
Year 2022-23.
On this basis, the Court held that Assessment Year
2012-13 clearly fell outside the permissible block of ten years and therefore
could not be reopened under Section 153C read with Section 153A. The Court
found no infirmity in the ITAT’s conclusion that assumption of jurisdiction by
the Assessing Officer was invalid.
In view of this finding, the Court held that it was
unnecessary to examine the other questions raised by the Revenue, including
those relating to protective additions and cross-examination.
Important
Clarification
The High Court reaffirmed that for proceedings
under Section 153C, the relevant block period must be computed with reference
to the date of recording of the satisfaction note by the Assessing Officer of
the non-searched person, and not the date of initiation of search. Any
assessment year falling outside such block cannot be subjected to proceedings
under Section 153C.
Final
Outcome
The appeal filed by the Revenue was dismissed. The
Delhi High Court held that no substantial question of law arose for
consideration and upheld the ITAT’s order quashing proceedings under Section
153C for Assessment Year 2012-13.
Link to
download order https://www.mytaxexpert.co.in/uploads/1769757325_THEPR.COMMISSIONEROFINCOMETAXCENTRAL1VsAMOLAWASTHI.pdf
Disclaimer
This content is shared strictly for general
information and knowledge purposes only. Readers should independently verify
the information from reliable sources. It is not intended to provide legal,
professional, or advisory guidance. The author and the organisation disclaim
all liability arising from the use of this content. The material has been
prepared with the assistance of AI tools.
0 Comments
Leave a Comment