Commissioner of Income Tax, Delhi-IV vs. M/s Gujarat Guardian Ltd. | Section 263 Revision Cannot Be Invoked Where Assessing Officer Has Adopted a Plausible View on Royalty Expenditure and Section 80HHC Deduction

Author
My Tax Expert
12/06/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 29
Read More »
Facts of the CaseM/s Gujarat Guardian Ltd., engaged in the manufacture and sale of float glass, filed its return of income declaring nil income under the normal provisions of the Act and book profits under Section 115J...

Commissioner of Income Tax vs Assessee – Revenue Appeal Dismissed Due to Low Tax Effect | Delhi High Court (ITA No. 279/2008)

Author
My Tax Expert
12/06/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 30
Read More »
Facts of the CasesThe Revenue had filed an appeal before the Delhi High Court against the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT). The appeal had initially been admitted ex parte by an order dated 26.09.2008....

Commissioner of Income Tax, Delhi-IV vs H.B. Stock Holdings Ltd. – Reassessment Under Section 147/148 Not Permissible on an Issue Already Decided in Favour of the Assessee

Author
My Tax Expert
12/06/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 28
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe assessee filed its return of income for Assessment Year 1995-96, declaring short-term capital gains arising from the sale of certain shares. The assessee treated such shares as investments and ac...

Commissioner of Income Tax v. Raghav Behl | Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) Not Leviable on Bona Fide Claim Where Two Views Are Possible – Delhi High Court

Author
My Tax Expert
12/06/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 29
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe Assessing Officer (AO), during proceedings under Section 147 of the Income-tax Act, 1961, examined the assessee's return for Assessment Year 2002-03. The assessee had claimed expenditure amounting ...

Commissioner of Income Tax, Delhi-VIII vs Mukesh Luthra – Reassessment under Sections 147/148 Invalid in Absence of Tangible Material; Section 80HHC Export Deduction Upheld | Delhi High Court

Author
My Tax Expert
12/06/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 37
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe Revenue initiated reassessment proceedings against the assessee, Mukesh Luthra, by issuing notices under Section 148 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 for Assessment Years 1997-98, 1998-99 and 1999-2000...

Commissioner of Income Tax vs. NIIT Ltd. | Section 194-I TDS on Infrastructure Claims Paid to Franchisees – Franchise Revenue Sharing Not Rent

Author
My Tax Expert
12/06/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 41
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe assessee, NIIT Ltd., was engaged in the business of providing computer education and training through its own centres as well as through franchisees operating under NIIT’s licence and brand name....

Commissioner of Income Tax vs. M/s Creative Dyeing & Printing Pvt. Ltd. – Business Advances for Commercial Purpose Not Taxable as Deemed Dividend Under Section 2(22)(e) of the Income Tax Act, 1961

Author
My Tax Expert
12/06/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 36
Read More »
Facts of the CaseM/s Creative Dyeing & Printing Pvt. Ltd. was engaged in the business of dyeing and printing cloth and functioned as an ancillary unit for M/s Pee Empro Exports Pvt. Ltd. for several years.Both comp...

Commissioner of Income Tax, Delhi-VIII vs. Mukesh Luthra | Reassessment under Sections 147/148 Invalid in Absence of Tangible Material – Delhi High Court

Author
My Tax Expert
12/06/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 42
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe Assessing Officer (AO) initiated reassessment proceedings under Section 148 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 for Assessment Years 1997-98, 1998-99 and 1999-2000 on the ground that income had escaped a...

Commissioner of Income Tax vs Assessees (ITA Nos. 870–879 of 2009) | Delhi High Court | Scope of Rectification under Section 254 of the Income-tax Act, 1961

Author
My Tax Expert
12/06/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 31
Read More »
Facts of the Case The ITAT dismissed the appeals filed by the assessees. The assessees challenged the Tribunal’s orders by filing appeals before the Delhi High Court under Section 260A of the Income-tax Act....

Indo Rama Synthetics (India) Ltd. vs Commissioner of Income Tax | Section 115JB MAT – Withdrawal from Revaluation Reserve Not Deductible Unless Added Back in Year of Creation

Author
My Tax Expert
12/06/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 36
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe assessee, Indo Rama Synthetics (India) Ltd., engaged in the business of manufacturing yarn and polyester products, computed its book profit for Assessment Year 2001-02 under Section 115JB after red...