Under Vivad Se Vishwas Act, Assessee May Settle nly Its Own Appeal and Not Departmental Appeal for Same Assessment Year; Unit of Settlement Is an Appeal: Rose Wood Buildwell Pvt. Ltd. vs. PCIT-7 (Delhi HC)O

Author
My Tax Expert
03/02/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 26
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe petitioner, Rose Wood Buildwell Private Limited, filed a writ petition challenging a certificate dated 23.04.2021 issued under Section 5(1) of the Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Act, 2020, whereby t...

Section 148A Order Set Aside for Non-Application of Mind and Erroneous Computation of Escapement; Matter Remanded for Fresh Consideration: Rishi Bansal vs. ITO (Delhi HC)

Author
My Tax Expert
03/02/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 28
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe petitioner, Rishi Bansal, filed a writ petition challenging an order dated 31.08.2024 passed under Section 148A(d) of the Income-tax Act and the consequential notice dated 31.08.2024 issued under ...

Loss on Sale of HTM Securities Cannot Be Disallowed Without Examining Supporting Material; Matter Remanded for Fresh Consideration under Section 45(2): Punjab National Bank vs. PCIT Delhi-V (Delhi HC)

Author
My Tax Expert
03/02/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 33
Read More »
Facts of the CasePunjab National Bank filed an appeal under Section 260A of the Income-tax Act challenging the order dated 16.03.2018 passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal for Assessment Year 2006-07. The disput...

Application under Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme Cannot Be Rejected Merely on Ground That Appeal May Be Non-Maintainable; Pendency of Appeal Constitutes Dispute: Prayas Buildwell Pvt. Ltd. vs. PCIT-7 (Delhi HC)

Author
My Tax Expert
03/02/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 31
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe petitioner, Prayas Buildwell Private Limited, filed a writ petition challenging a communication dated 18.12.2020 whereby its declaration filed in Form 1 under the Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Act, ...

Penalty under Section 271(1)(c) Unsustainable for Vague Notice Not Specifying Exact Charge; Defective Penalty Notice Vitiates Proceedings: PCIT-7 vs. Sara SAE Pvt. Ltd. (Delhi HC)

Author
My Tax Expert
03/02/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 31
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe Revenue filed an appeal under Section 260A of the Income-tax Act challenging the order passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal deleting penalty levied under Section 271(1)(c) for Assessment Ye...

Transfer Pricing Comparability Is a Factual Determination; Exclusion of KPO and High-End BPO Companies Upheld and No Substantial Question of Law Arises: PCIT-4 vs. Symphony Marketing Solutions India Pvt. Ltd. (Delhi HC)

Author
My Tax Expert
03/02/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 27
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe Revenue filed an appeal under Section 260A of the Income-tax Act against the order dated 18.08.2017 passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal in IT (TP) A No. 111/Bang/2014 for Assessment Year 2...

Penalty under Section 271(1)(c) Invalid for Vague Notice Without Specifying Charge; Defective Notice Vitiates Penalty Proceedings: PCIT-7 vs. Virtual Software and Training Pvt. Ltd. (Delhi HC)

Author
My Tax Expert
03/02/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 25
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe Revenue filed an appeal under Section 260A of the Income-tax Act against the order passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal deleting penalty levied under Section 271(1)(c) for Assessment Year ...

Revision under Section 263 Valid Where Assessing Officer Conducted No Inquiry on Agricultural Land Claim; Order Erroneous and Prejudicial to Revenue: PCIT-11 vs. Sangeeta Jain (Delhi HC)

Author
My Tax Expert
03/02/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 23
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe Revenue filed an appeal under Section 260A of the Income-tax Act challenging the order dated 15.02.2018 passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal for Assessment Year 2013-14. The assessee, Ms. S...

Reassessment under Section 147 Invalid Where Proceedings Mandatorily Fall under Section 153C; Special Search Provisions Override General Reopening Powers: PCIT-7 vs. Naveen Kumar Gupta (Delhi HC)

Author
My Tax Expert
03/02/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 25
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe Revenue filed an appeal under Section 260A of the Income-tax Act challenging the order dated 09.12.2021 passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal for Assessment Year 2011-12. The ITAT had allowe...

Reassessment Invalid Where No Addition Made on Recorded Reasons; Other Additions Cannot Survive Independently – PCIT-7 vs. Sunlight Tour and Travels Pvt. Ltd. (Delhi High Court)

Author
My Tax Expert
03/02/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 34
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe assessee, Sunlight Tour and Travels Pvt. Ltd., had originally filed its return for Assessment Year 2007–08, which was scrutinised and assessed under Section 143(3). Subsequently, the Assessing Of...