Writ Not Maintainable Against GST Adjudication When Statutory Appeal Exists: Calcutta HC in LGW Industries Ltd.

Author
My Tax Expert
12/01/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 541
Read More »
The Calcutta High Court, in LGW Industries Limited v. Assistant Commissioner of Revenue, State Tax & Ors., examined the maintainability of a writ petition challenging an adjudication order passed under Section 74 ...

GST Recovery Before Show Cause Notice Without Voluntary Self-Ascertainment Illegal: Karnataka HC in Kesar Colour Chem Industries

Author
My Tax Expert
12/01/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 384
Read More »
The Karnataka High Court, in M/s Kesar Colour Chem Industries v. The Intelligence Officer & Ors., examined the legality of recovery of tax amounts during the course of investigation under the Central Goods and Ser...

Tax on Cooked Food in Luxury Hotels Valid: Supreme Court Upholds Classification in Kerala Hotel & Restaurant Association Case

Author
My Tax Expert
12/01/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 649
Read More »
The Supreme Court, in Kerala Hotel & Restaurant Association v. State of Kerala & Ors., examined the constitutional validity of provisions under the Kerala General Sales Tax Act, 1963 and the Tamil Nadu General...

Allahabad High Court Holds: Department Must Prove Intent to Evade Tax Where GST Discrepancy Is Only Clerical – Indeutsch Industries Pvt. Ltd. v. State of U.P. (2024)

Author
My Tax Expert
12/01/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 469
Read More »
In M/s Indeutsch Industries Pvt. Ltd. v. State of Uttar Pradesh & Others, the Allahabad High Court examined the legality of penalty proceedings initiated under Section 129 of the U.P. Goods and Services Tax Act, 2...

Minor E-Way Bill Vehicle Number Error Not Ground for Penalty under Section 129: Allahabad HC in M/S Bmr Enterprises Vs State Of Up

Author
My Tax Expert
12/01/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 510
Read More »
The Allahabad High Court, in M/s BMR Enterprises v. State of Uttar Pradesh & Ors., examined the legality of a penalty imposed under Section 129(3) of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017, on account of a d...

Rule 86A Cannot Create Negative ITC Balance: Delhi HC in Best Crop Science Pvt. Ltd.

Author
My Tax Expert
12/01/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 411
Read More »
The Delhi High Court, in Best Crop Science Pvt. Ltd. v. Principal Commissioner, CGST Commissionerate, Meerut & Ors., considered a batch of writ petitions challenging orders passed under Rule 86A of the Central Goo...

Excess Stock Found During GST Survey Cannot Justify Confiscation Under Section 130 – Allahabad High Court | Dinesh Kumar Pradeep Kumar v. Additional Commissioner (2024)

Author
My Tax Expert
12/01/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 662
Read More »
In Dinesh Kumar Pradeep Kumar v. Additional Commissioner Grade-2 & Another, the Allahabad High Court examined the legality of GST proceedings initiated solely on the basis of alleged excess stock found during a su...

Input Tax Credit Cannot Be Denied to Bona Fide Purchaser for Supplier’s GST Default – Tripura High Court in Sahil Enterprises v. Union of India (WP(C) No. 688 of 2022)

Author
My Tax Expert
11/01/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 1562
Read More »
The writ petition before the High Court of Tripura challenged the constitutional validity of Section 16(2)(c) of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 and assailed the order dated 17.05.2022 passed by the Assistan...

Rule 86A Cannot Create Negative Balance in Electronic Credit Ledger: Delhi High Court Restricts Blocking of ITC Beyond Available Credit — Best Crop Science Pvt. Ltd. v. Principal Commissioner, CGST, Meerut (W.P.(C) 10980/2024 & Connected Matters | Delhi High Court)

Author
My Tax Expert
08/01/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 536
Read More »
The batch of writ petitions before the Delhi High Court involved a common controversy concerning the scope and limits of powers exercisable under Rule 86A of the Central Goods and Services Tax Rules, 2017. The petitioner...

GST Recovery Stayed During Statutory Appeal Period: Allahabad High Court Quashes Premature Recovery from Electronic Credit Ledger, M/s S.A.B. Engg Works v. State of U.P. (WRIT TAX No. 2254 of 2025)

Author
My Tax Expert
08/01/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 1046
Read More »
The writ petition challenged the action of the tax authorities in forcibly recovering the demand amount from the petitioner’s Electronic Credit Ledger and Electronic Cash Ledger under Section 79 of the CGST Act, 2017.T...