M/s Fone Zone NXT vs Commissioner of DGST & Anr.: Delhi HC Upholds Ex Parte GST Assessment Orders and Rejects Blame on Chartered Accountant

Author
My Tax Expert
18/03/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 91
Read More »
Facts of the Case:M/s Fone Zone NXT (Proprietor: Mr. Gaurav Madan) obtained GST registration on 1 July 2017 and engaged in the sale of mobile phones and accessories. The petitioner regularly filed returns and had the G...

Principal Commissioner, CGST Delhi South Commissionerate v. M/s Bureau of Energy Efficiency

Author
My Tax Expert
18/03/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 114
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe present appeal was filed by the Revenue challenging an order passed by the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT). The dispute primarily related to taxability of services and...

Principal Commissioner of CGST vs. M/s Pro-Interactive Services India Pvt. Ltd. – Scope of Service Tax Liability on Composite Service Activities

Author
My Tax Expert
18/03/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 81
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe respondent company was engaged in providing multiple taxable services including security services, manpower supply, and construction-related services. The dispute arose from a service tax demand ...

Fraudulent ITC Recipient Case Not Entertained in Writ; Assessee Relegated to Statutory Appeal with Time Protection – Utkarsh Arora (M/s Aura Interior Hardware) vs. Additional Commissioner CGST (Delhi HC)

Author
My Tax Expert
27/01/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 182
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe petitioner, Utkarsh Arora, proprietor of M/s Aura Interior Hardware, filed a writ petition under Article 226 challenging the Order-in-Original dated 27 January 2025, dispatched on 1 February 2025,...

GST Adjudication Order Set Aside Where SCN Was Uploaded Only on ‘Additional Notices’ Tab: Matter Remanded Subject to Section 168A Outcome – Techcoral Solutions vs. Commissioner of DGST (Delhi High Court)

Author
My Tax Expert
27/01/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 156
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe petitioner, Techcoral Solutions, filed a writ petition challenging the show cause notice dated 26.09.2023 issued for Financial Year 2017-18 and the consequent adjudication order dated 14.12.2023. ...

Fresh GST Registration Cannot Be Denied During Pendency of Appeal After Statutory Pre-Deposit: Section 107(7) Applied – Sarabjeet Singh vs. Commissioner of SGST (Delhi High Court)

Author
My Tax Expert
27/01/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 276
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe petitioner, Shri Sarabjeet Singh, proprietor of M/s Khurana Associates, had an earlier GST registration which was cancelled following disruption of business during the COVID-19 period. A show caus...

Fraudulent ITC Recipient Case Not Entertained in Writ; Assessee Relegated to Statutory Appeal with Time Protection – Sardar Auto Traders vs. Additional Commissioner CGST (Delhi HC)

Author
My Tax Expert
27/01/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 187
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe petitioner, Sardar Auto Traders, challenged an order dated 4 February 2025 issued in Form GST DRC-07 for Assessment Year 2017-18 under the CGST Act. The investigation was initiated based on a refe...

GST Adjudication Order Set Aside for Non-Consideration of Reply; Matter Remanded with Personal Hearing Subject to Supreme Court Decision on Section 168A Notifications – RSA Impex LLP vs. Commissioner of DGST (Delhi HC)

Author
My Tax Expert
27/01/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 169
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe petitioner, RSA Impex LLP, challenged a show cause notice dated 31 May 2024 and the consequent adjudication order dated 20 August 2024 raising a demand of ₹13,38,244. The petitioner also challen...

Payments for Cloud-Based E-Invoicing Services Not Fees for Technical Services under India–UK DTAA: Make Available Test Not Satisfied – Tungsten Automation England Ltd. vs. DCIT (Delhi High Court)

Author
My Tax Expert
27/01/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 167
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe appellant, Tungsten Automation England Limited, a company incorporated and tax resident of the United Kingdom, was engaged in providing electronic invoicing services through its proprietary cloud-...

₹48 Crore GST Demand in Fake ITC Case Not Entertained in Writ; Assessee Relegated to Statutory Appeal with Limited Time Relief – Samyak Jain vs. Superintendent (Adjudication), Central GST Delhi (Delhi HC)

Author
My Tax Expert
27/01/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 247
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe petitioner, Samyak Jain, challenged an adjudication order dated 31 January 2025 raising a GST demand exceeding ₹48 crore. The petitioner was earlier registered under the VAT regime under the tra...