Blog Categories
All Posts
Accounting Standard 7
CBDT 1
Chartered Accountant 1
Chartered Engineer 1
Greetings 1
Income Tax Act 2025 0
Labour Law 2
MCA Notification 1
MSME 1
NGO- Trust & Society 0
PLACEMENT 1
Press Information Bureau, Government of India (PIB) 2
RBI & Banks 1
RERA 0
RTI 1
STUDENT ICAI 1
Virtual Webinar 5
Subscribe to Newsletter
Join our subscribers list to get the latest Tax Updates and Opportunities.
Commissioner of Income Tax v. Modi Industries Limited [(2010) Delhi High Court] – Eligibility of Deduction under Section 80J, Taxability of Excess Levy Sugar Realisation, Applicability of Section 40A(5), and Initial Depreciation on Residential Quarters
Facts of the Case
The assessee, Modi Industries Limited, claimed various deductions
and tax benefits under the Income-tax Act, 1961.
The Revenue disputed:
Non-applicability of Section 40A(5)(c) to salar...
Commissioner of Income Tax vs. Engineers India Ltd. | Reassessment Beyond Four Years Invalid in Absence of Failure to Disclose Material Facts | Section 147, 148, 143(3) & 260A of the Income-tax Act, 1961
Facts of the
Case
Engineers India Ltd. was assessed for Assessment Year 1996-97.
During the original assessment proceedings, the Assessing Officer
issued notices and questionnaires under Section 142(1) of the ...
Commissioner of Income Tax vs. M/s National Hydroelectric Power Corporation Ltd. — Validity of Reassessment Notice Issued Under Section 148 Beyond Four Years When Committee on Disputes (COD) Refuses Permission to Revenue Department to File Appeal
Facts of the CaseThe Income Tax Department initiated reassessment proceedings
against the respondent-assessee. The Assessing Officer issued formal notices
for reassessment under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act. Howev...
Commissioner of Income Tax vs. M/s Jaipur Golden Transport Co. (Regd.) | Delhi High Court | Section 260A & Section 145 of the Income-tax Act, 1961
Facts of the
Case
The Assessing Officer had made various additions and disallowances
during the assessment proceedings for Assessment Year 2003-04.
The assessee challenged the additions before the Commissioner...
Commissioner of Income Tax vs Career Launcher (India) Limited | Delhi High Court | Non-Compete Fee, Interest on Land Acquisition & Write-off of Advances under Sections 37(1), 36(1)(vii), 36(2) and 260A of the Income-tax Act, 1961
Facts of the
CaseThe assessee, Career Launcher (India) Limited, for
Assessment Year 2004-05, claimed deduction of various expenditures including:
Non-compete fee of Rs. 5,40,000 paid to Mr. Vijay Kalyan Jha and
...
Commissioner of Income Tax, Delhi-II vs. M.M.T.C. Ltd. (Delhi High Court) – Deductibility of Business Loss Incurred Under Consignment and Distribution Agreement
Facts of the CaseThe Department of Fertilizers, Ministry of
Chemicals and Fertilizers, Government of India awarded a contract to Paradeep
Phosphates Ltd. (PPL), a public sector undertaking.Subsequently, PPL entered int...
Commissioner of Income Tax-VII vs. Vivek Bikki Kacker (2010) – Addition under Section 69 Based Solely on DVO Valuation Report Not Sustainable in Absence of Evidence of Understatement of Purchase Consideration
Facts of the
CaseThe assessee, Mr. Vivek Bikki Kacker, filed his
return of income for Assessment Year 2003-04 declaring income of ₹2,47,691.During scrutiny assessment, the Assessing Officer
noticed that the assessee...
Commissioner of Income Tax v. Reliance International Corp. Pvt. Ltd. (2010) 327 ITR – Section 68 Cash Credit Addition – Assessee Failed to Prove Identity, Creditworthiness and Genuineness of Creditors | Delhi High Court
Facts of the
CaseFor the assessment year under consideration, the
assessee-company disclosed loans aggregating to ₹17,10,000 allegedly received
from five parties:
Gayatri Tech. Services – ₹7,75,000
S.K. Mehr...
Commissioner of Income Tax vs. M/s. Xerox Modicorp Limited | Validity of Reassessment Proceedings Under Section 147 vs. Disallowance of Investment Allowance Under Section 32A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 for Manufacture of Office Machinery Listed Under Eleventh Schedule
FACTS OF THE CASE
Assessee’s
Business Operations: The respondent-assessee, M/s. Xerox
Modicorp Limited, was actively engaged in the industrial manufacturing and
commercial marketing of xerographic m...
Commissioner of Income Tax vs. Inderpal Chawla | Delhi High Court Upholds Admission of Additional Evidence under Rule 46A and Restricts Addition to Peak Credit under Sections 68 & 69 of the Income Tax Act
Facts of the
Case
The Assessing Officer made an addition of ₹29,80,995 treating
certain deposits as unexplained income under Sections 68 and 69 of the
Income Tax Act, 1961.
During appellate proceedings...