Facts of
the Case
The
assessee, Aatash Norcontrol Limited, filed its appeal for Assessment Year
2019-20 against the order dated 15.09.2025 passed by the Commissioner of Income
Tax (Appeals), National Faceless Appeal Centre, Delhi. The appeal before the
CIT(A) was dismissed ex parte without adjudicating the issues on merits. The
assessment involved reopening under Section 147 and disallowance of bad debts
amounting to ₹1,31,16,367 claimed under Section 36(1)(vii). The assessee also
raised objections regarding improper transfer from faceless assessment to
jurisdictional Assessing Officer under Section 144B and violation of principles
of natural justice.
Aggrieved by
the ex-parte dismissal, the assessee filed an appeal before the Income Tax
Appellate Tribunal, Ahmedabad Bench.
Issues
Involved
Whether the
CIT(A) was justified in passing an ex-parte order without adjudicating the
appeal on merits, whether such dismissal violated Section 250(6) and principles
of natural justice, and whether the issues relating to reopening under Section
147 and disallowance of bad debts required fresh adjudication.
Petitioner’s
Arguments
The assessee
contended that the CIT(A) erred in deciding the appeal ex parte without
examining the merits of the case. It was submitted that the assessee had
undertaken two distinct projects with Gujarat Maritime Board, one at the Gulf
of Kutch and another at the Gulf of Khambhat. The assessee argued that
allegations relied upon by the Revenue related to the Gulf of Khambhat project,
whereas the transactions under dispute pertained to the Gulf of Kutch project.
These crucial factual distinctions were neither examined by the Assessing
Officer nor considered by the CIT(A). The assessee therefore prayed for
restoration of the matter for fresh adjudication.
Respondent’s
Arguments
The Revenue
relied on the order of the CIT(A) and placed reliance on the judgment of the
Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of Jinofer Kawasji Bhujwala, contending that
the said judgment had a bearing on the adjudication of the matter.
Court
Order / Findings
The ITAT
Ahmedabad observed that the CIT(A) had passed an ex-parte order without
adjudicating the grounds raised by the assessee, thereby violating the mandate
of Section 250(6) which requires passing of a reasoned and speaking order. The
Tribunal further noted that the factual distinction between the two Gujarat
Maritime Board projects, as highlighted by the assessee, was a vital aspect
that had not been examined at any stage.
In the
interest of justice and to ensure proper adjudication, the Tribunal held that
the matter required fresh consideration. Accordingly, the Tribunal set aside
the impugned order of the CIT(A) and restored the matter to his file for de
novo adjudication on merits after granting reasonable opportunity of being
heard to the assessee. The Tribunal directed the assessee to place all relevant
evidence before the CIT(A) and refrain from seeking unnecessary adjournments.
Important
Clarification
The Tribunal
clarified that appellate authorities are duty-bound to adjudicate appeals on
merits by passing reasoned orders in compliance with Section 250(6). Ex-parte
dismissal of appeals without examination of factual and legal issues amounts to
violation of principles of natural justice and cannot be sustained.
Final
Outcome
The appeal
filed by the assessee was allowed for statistical purposes. The ex-parte
order passed by the CIT(A), NFAC was set aside and the matter was restored to
the file of the CIT(A) for fresh adjudication on merits in accordance with law
after providing adequate opportunity of being heard to the assessee.
Source Link - https://www.mytaxexpert.co.in/uploads/1769062381_AATASHNOTCONTROLLIMITEDAHMEDABADVS.THEDY.CITCIRLCE111AHMEDABAD.pdf
Disclaimer
This content
is shared strictly for general information and knowledge purposes only. Readers
should independently verify the information from reliable sources. It is not
intended to provide legal, professional, or advisory guidance. The author and
the organisation disclaim all liability arising from the use of this content.
The material has been prepared with the assistance of AI tools.
0 Comments
Leave a Comment