Assessment Restored Due to Incorrect Bank Account Reference in Reopening Reasons and Ex Parte Orders: Pradeep Kumar Narsaria vs. ITO, Ward-2(1), Ranchi (ITAT)

Author
My Tax Expert
24/01/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 357
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe assessee, Pradeep Kumar Narsaria, filed his return of income for Assessment Year 2015-16 declaring income of ₹3,04,524. The assessee operated a small Dish-TV recharge shop. The Assessing Officer...

Matter Restored to CIT (Exemption) for Fresh Adjudication Due to Non-Furnishing of Documents: Paras Nath Digambar Jain Uchch Vidyalaya vs. CIT (Exemption), Patna (ITAT)

Author
My Tax Expert
24/01/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 288
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe assessee, Paras Nath Digambar Jain Uchch Vidyalaya, Giridih, filed an appeal against the order dated 07.03.2023 passed by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemption), Patna. The assessee is an edu...

Agricultural Income Accepted After Physical Verification by Department: Disallowance Deleted – Nitesh Nath Shah Deo vs. DCIT, Circle-1, Ranchi (ITAT)

Author
My Tax Expert
24/01/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 408
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe assessee, Nitesh Nath Shah Deo, filed an appeal against the order of the Additional/Joint Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), Bengaluru dated 28.03.2025 for Assessment Year 2015-16. The assessee...

Reassessment Quashed for Borrowed Satisfaction and Addition under Section 56(2)(x) Deleted on Merits: Naveen Singh vs. DCIT, Circle-1, Jamshedpur (ITAT)

Author
My Tax Expert
24/01/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 344
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe assessee, Naveen Singh, filed his return of income for Assessment Year 2017-18 declaring total income of ₹43,99,340, which was processed under Section 143(1). Subsequently, the Assessing Officer...

Delay Condoned and Ex Parte Appellate Order Set Aside in the Interest of Substantial Justice: M/s R.P. Singh & Co. vs. DCIT/ACIT, Circle-1, Ranchi (ITAT)

Author
My Tax Expert
24/01/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 290
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe assessee, M/s R.P. Singh & Company, filed an appeal against the order of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), NFAC, Delhi dated 20.07.2023 for Assessment Year 2016-17. The appeal before t...

Assessment Proceedings Set Aside for Failure to Bring Legal Representative on Record After Death of Assessee: Late Sabita Prasad vs. ITO, Ward-3(1), Ranchi (ITAT)

Author
My Tax Expert
23/01/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 365
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe appeals were filed by the husband and legal heir of Late Sabita Prasad for Assessment Years 2012-13 and 2013-14 against orders passed by the appellate authorities. The assessment orders for both ...

Assessment Restored for Fresh Adjudication Due to Non-Cooperation by Assessee with Exemplary Costs: Jharkhand State Food and Civil Supplies Corporation Ltd. vs. DCIT/ACIT, Ranchi (ITAT)

Author
My Tax Expert
23/01/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 376
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe assessee, Jharkhand State Food and Civil Supplies Corporation Limited, filed an appeal against the order of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), NFAC, Delhi for Assessment Year 2018-19. Duri...

Reassessment Quashed for Parallel Proceedings and Absence of Mandatory Notice under Section 143(2): ITO, Ranchi vs. Amba Carbonisation Pvt. Ltd. (ITAT Ranchi)

Author
My Tax Expert
23/01/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 392
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe assessee, Amba Carbonisation Pvt. Ltd., is engaged in the business of manufacturing and trading of smokeless coal and coke. For Assessment Year 2013-14, the original assessment under Section 143(3...

Appeal Dismissed as Infructuous After Assessment Set Aside under Section 263: Daltonganj Catholic Diocese vs. ITO (Exemptions), Ranchi (ITAT)

Author
My Tax Expert
23/01/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 406
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe assessee, Daltonganj Catholic Diocese, filed an appeal against the order of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), NFAC, Delhi, relating to Assessment Year 2016-17. The appeal arose out of an ...

Reopening Beyond Four Years Invalid Without Failure to Disclose Material Facts; Reassessment Quashed for Jurisdictional Defect: ITAT Ranchi in Bishnu Transport Company vs. DCIT

Author
My Tax Expert
23/01/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 379
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe appeal was filed by Bishnu Transport Company against the reassessment order passed by the Assessing Officer under Section 147 read with Section 143(3) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 for Assessment Ye...