Facts of the
Case
The assessee, Amba Carbonisation Pvt. Ltd., is
engaged in the business of manufacturing and trading of smokeless coal and
coke. For Assessment Year 2013-14, the original assessment under Section 143(3)
was completed on 14.10.2015. Subsequently, the Assessing Officer issued two
notices under Section 148 dated 16.03.2021 and 31.03.2021 for the same
assessment year on identical grounds alleging discrepancies between bank credits
and declared turnover. While proceedings initiated pursuant to the first notice
dated 16.03.2021 remained pending and were never formally concluded or dropped,
the Assessing Officer initiated parallel reassessment proceedings by issuing a
second notice dated 31.03.2021. The reassessment order dated 30.03.2022 was
passed pursuant to the second notice, making an addition of ₹13,64,83,677 under
Section 69A of the Act, without issuing any notice under Section 143(2) in the
proceedings initiated by the second notice.
Issues
Involved
Whether parallel reassessment proceedings under
Section 148 can be initiated for the same assessment year without concluding
the earlier proceedings, whether issuance of notice under Section 143(2) is
mandatory in reassessment proceedings, and whether absence of such notice
renders the reassessment order void ab initio and incapable of being cured
under Section 292B.
Petitioner’s
Arguments
The Revenue contended that the Assessing Officer
had issued a notice under Section 143(2) dated 21.01.2022 and that the assessee
had participated in the reassessment proceedings. It was argued that issuance
of notice under Section 143(2) in one set of proceedings constituted sufficient
compliance and that the ld. CIT(A) erred in quashing the reassessment order on
technical grounds.
Respondent’s
Arguments
The assessee argued that the notice under Section
143(2) dated 21.01.2022 pertained only to the reassessment proceedings
initiated pursuant to the notice dated 16.03.2021, in which no assessment order
was ultimately passed. The reassessment order was passed pursuant to the second
notice dated 31.03.2021, in respect of which no notice under Section 143(2) was
ever issued. It was further contended that two parallel reassessment
proceedings are impermissible in law and that issuance of notice under Section
143(2) is a jurisdictional requirement which cannot be dispensed with.
Court Order
/ Findings
The ITAT Ranchi observed that it was an undisputed
fact that two notices under Section 148 dated 16.03.2021 and 31.03.2021 were
issued for the same assessment year. The Tribunal noted that notice under
Section 143(2) was issued only in the proceedings arising from the first notice
dated 16.03.2021, in which no reassessment order was passed. The reassessment order
dated 30.03.2022 was passed pursuant to the second notice dated 31.03.2021
without issuance of notice under Section 143(2). Relying on the decisions of
the Hon’ble Supreme Court in ACIT v. Hotel Blue Moon and CIT v. Laxman Das
Khandelwal, the Tribunal held that issuance of notice under Section 143(2) is
mandatory and its absence is a jurisdictional defect not curable under Section
292B. The Tribunal further held that parallel reassessment proceedings without
concluding earlier proceedings demonstrate non-application of mind and are
impermissible in law. Accordingly, the reassessment order was held to be void
ab initio.
Important
Clarification
The Tribunal clarified that participation of the
assessee in reassessment proceedings does not cure the absence of a mandatory
notice under Section 143(2). Further, reassessment proceedings must be carried
out in a single, continuous manner and the Assessing Officer cannot initiate
multiple parallel proceedings for the same assessment year on identical
reasons.
Final
Outcome
The appeal filed by the Revenue was dismissed, and
the order of the ld. CIT(A) quashing the reassessment order passed under
Section 147 of the Income-tax Act was upheld.
Link
to Download Order- https://www.mytaxexpert.co.in/uploads/1769079390_INCOMETAXOFFICERRANCHIJHARKHANDVS.AMBACARBONISATIONPVT.LTD.RANCHIJHARKHAND.pdf
Disclaimer
This content is shared strictly for general information and knowledge purposes only. Readers should independently verify the information from reliable sources. It is not intended to provide legal, professional, or advisory guidance. The author and the organisation disclaim all liability arising from the use of this content. The material has been prepared with the assistance of AI tools.
0 Comments
Leave a Comment