Search of Multiple Bank Lockers under Section 132 Valid Where Bona Fide Reasons to Believe Exist; CBDT Instruction No. 1916 Not Absolute – Raj Krishan Gupta & Ors. vs. PDIT (Investigation) (Delhi High Court)

Author
My Tax Expert
30/01/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 30
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe petitioners, members of the same family, filed a writ petition seeking a declaration that the search and seizure conducted on 11.05.2024 under Section 132 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 on three bank ...

Reassessment Valid Where Risk Management Information Indicates Bogus Purchases and AO Applies Mind under Section 148A: No Interference in Writ Jurisdiction – R S Alloys vs. ITO (Delhi High Court)

Author
My Tax Expert
30/01/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 21
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe petitioner, R S Alloys, a partnership firm engaged in trading of ferrous and non-ferrous metals, filed its return of income for Assessment Year 2019–20 under Section 139(1) of the Income-tax Act,...

Disallowance under Section 40(a)(i) Barred by Non-Discrimination Clause under DTAA; No TDS Obligation Where Income Not Chargeable to Tax: Revenue Appeal Dismissed – PCIT-04 vs. Mitsubishi Corporation (India) Pvt. Ltd. (Delhi High Court)

Author
My Tax Expert
30/01/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 31
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe Revenue filed an appeal under Section 260A of the Income-tax Act, 1961 challenging the order dated 12.08.2022 passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal in ITA No. 9364/Del/2019 for Assessment Yea...

Interest on FDRs Earned from Project-Linked Funds Is Capital Receipt and Not Income from Other Sources: Revenue Appeal Dismissed – PCIT-1 vs. Brahma Center Development Pvt. Ltd. (Delhi High Court)

Author
My Tax Expert
30/01/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 20
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe Revenue filed an appeal under Section 260A of the Income-tax Act, 1961 challenging the order dated 17.07.2023 passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Delhi Bench, allowing the appeal of the a...

AMP Expenses Not an International Transaction; Bright Line Test Impermissible; Revenue Appeals Dismissed – PCIT-1 vs. Casio India Co. Pvt. Ltd. (Delhi HC)

Author
My Tax Expert
30/01/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 26
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe Revenue filed appeals under Section 260A of the Income-tax Act, 1961 challenging the common order dated 24.02.2020 passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Delhi Bench, deciding ITA Nos. 385/D...

ITAT Justified in Remanding Subsidy Taxability Pending Supreme Court Decision; After-Sales Provision Allowable on Scientific Basis – PCIT Noida vs. Triveni Engineering (Delhi HC)

Author
My Tax Expert
30/01/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 20
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe Revenue filed an appeal under Section 260A of the Income-tax Act, 1961 challenging the order dated 29.01.2025 passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, which disposed of twelve appeals relating ...

No Depreciation Disallowance on Discarded Assets within Block; AMP Adjustment Unsustainable; Revenue Appeal Dismissed – PCIT-7 vs. Sony India Pvt. Ltd. (Delhi HC)

Author
My Tax Expert
30/01/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 20
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe Revenue filed an appeal under Section 260A of the Income-tax Act, 1961 challenging the order dated 30.08.2024 passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal for Assessment Year 2010-11. The Tribunal h...

Jurisdictional Assessing Officer Competent to Initiate Reassessment Despite Faceless Scheme; Writ Dismissed Following TKS Builders – Neena Wadhwa vs. PCIT (Delhi HC)

Author
My Tax Expert
30/01/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 25
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe petitioner, Neena Wadhwa, filed a writ petition challenging the notice dated 20.03.2024 issued under Section 148A(b) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, the approval dated 30.03.2024 granted under Sectio...

Jurisdictional Assessing Officer Has Concurrent Power to Initiate Reassessment Despite Faceless Regime; TKS Builders Followed – M/s Empire Fasteners vs. ACIT (Delhi HC)

Author
My Tax Expert
30/01/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 13
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe petitioner, M/s Empire Fasteners, filed two writ petitions challenging the order dated 27.06.2025 passed under Section 148A(3) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 and the consequential notice dated 27.06....

Department Directed to Release Refund with Interest Within Eight Weeks; Liberty Granted to Seek Revival if Shortfall Persists – Anil Kumar Goel vs. PCIT (Delhi HC)

Author
My Tax Expert
30/01/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 35
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe petitioner, Mr. Anil Kumar Goel, approached the Delhi High Court seeking issuance of a writ of mandamus directing the Income Tax Department to issue consequential refunds in compliance with the or...