Facts of the Case
The Revenue filed an appeal under Section 260A of
the Income-tax Act, 1961 challenging the order dated 30.08.2024 passed by the
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal for Assessment Year 2010-11. The Tribunal had
partially allowed the assessee’s appeal and dismissed the Revenue’s appeal.
The issues before the Tribunal related to
disallowance of depreciation on assets of the Dharuhera unit which were
discarded during the year, and transfer pricing adjustments relating to
Advertisement, Marketing and Promotion (AMP) expenses, including application of
the Bright Line Test.
Issues Involved
Whether depreciation can be disallowed on assets
discarded during the year when the block of assets continues to exist, whether
separate AMP adjustment is warranted when the distribution activity is already
benchmarked, and whether BLT can be applied for AMP adjustment.
Appellant’s Arguments
The Revenue proposed three substantial questions
of law contending that the ITAT erred in deleting depreciation on discarded
assets which were allegedly no longer owned by the assessee, erred in holding
that no separate AMP adjustment was required, and erred in directing partial
benchmarking of AMP reimbursement when the Transfer Pricing Officer had applied
the Bright Line Test and the AMP issue was pending before the Supreme Court.
Respondent’s Arguments
Though unrepresented at the hearing, the assessee
relied on binding precedents of the Delhi High Court in its own cases. It was
contended that depreciation is allowable as long as the block of assets
continues to exist and that AMP adjustments based on BLT are legally
unsustainable. Reliance was placed on earlier Sony India judgments and the
ruling in Sony Ericsson Mobile Communications India Pvt. Ltd.
Court Order / Findings
The Delhi High Court recorded the submission of
the Revenue that substantial questions of law relating to AMP adjustments stood
covered against the Revenue by the earlier Division Bench judgment of the Court
in Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax-8 vs. Sony India Pvt. Ltd. The Court held
that no substantial question of law arose on issues relating to AMP adjustment
and BLT, and accordingly rejected questions B and C.
As regards depreciation on the Dharuhera unit, the
Court noted that the ITAT had relied on the judgment of the Delhi High Court in
Sony India (P) Ltd. vs. Commissioner of Income Tax, which in turn followed the
law laid down in CIT vs. Ansal Properties & Infrastructure Ltd. and Oswal
Agro Mills Ltd. The Court reiterated that depreciation is allowable on block of
assets and cannot be denied merely because certain individual assets were
discarded, so long as the block of assets does not cease to exist.
The Court observed that the Revenue did not
dispute that the issue stood covered by binding precedent and held that no
substantial question of law arose even on the depreciation issue.
Important Clarification
The Court clarified that under the block of assets
regime, individual use or discard of specific assets is irrelevant for
depreciation, provided the block continues to exist. It also reaffirmed that
AMP adjustments based on the Bright Line Test are legally impermissible and
unsustainable.
Final Outcome
The appeal filed by the Revenue was dismissed. The
Delhi High Court upheld the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal allowing
depreciation on assets forming part of the block of assets and deleting AMP
adjustments, holding that no substantial question of law arose for
consideration, thereby deciding the matter in favour of Sony India Private
Limited and against the Revenue.
Link to download order- https://www.mytaxexpert.co.in/uploads/1769681824_PR.COMMISSIONEROFINCOMETAX7DELHIVsSONYINDIAPRIVATELIMITED.pdf
Disclaimer
This content is shared strictly for general
information and knowledge purposes only. Readers should independently verify
the information from reliable sources. It is not intended to provide legal,
professional, or advisory guidance. The author and the organisation disclaim
all liability arising from the use of this content. The material has been
prepared with the assistance of AI tools.
0 Comments
Leave a Comment