Toby Consultants (P) Ltd. vs Commissioner of Income Tax – Addition under Section 68 for Unexplained Cash Credits and Failure to Prove Genuineness of Loan Transactions Applying the Test of Human Probabilities | Delhi High Court

Author
My Tax Expert
11/06/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 36
Read More »
Facts of the Case The assessee company was engaged in the business of investment in securities. For Assessment Year 2001-02, the assessee disclosed unsecured loans amounting to: Rs. 2,6...

Commissioner of Income Tax vs. Assessee (Appellant): A Judicial Analysis on the Scope of Section 263 of the Income Tax Act, 1961

Author
My Tax Expert
11/06/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 29
Read More »
Facts of the CaseFor the Assessment Year 2001-02, an assessment order was initially finalized by the Assessing Officer (AO) on February 26, 2004, under Section 143(2) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. Following a review of ...

Commissioner of Income-Tax, Central-III vs Paltiputra International Trading Ltd. – Validity of Search Warrants, Limitation for Block Assessment and Authority under Sections 132 & 158BE of the Income-tax Act, 1961 | Delhi High Court

Author
My Tax Expert
11/06/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 24
Read More »
Facts of the Case Search and seizure operations were conducted against a group of companies connected with the alleged Urea Scam investigations. Warrants of authorization were issued for search of l...

M/s Havells India Ltd. vs Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax – Validity of Special Audit under Section 142(2A) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 and Requirement of a Speaking Order | Delhi High Court

Author
My Tax Expert
11/06/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 28
Read More »
 Facts of the Case A show cause notice dated 30 September 2009 was issued to the petitioner proposing a Special Audit under Section 142(2A). The notice contained detailed allegations and observ...

Commissioner of Income Tax vs. Sahara Airlines Ltd. (2009:DHC:8824-DB): A Comprehensive Legal Analysis of TDS Obligations on Payments for Foreign Software Services under Section 195(2) of the Income Tax Act, 1961

Author
My Tax Expert
11/06/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 32
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe respondent, Sahara Airlines Ltd., engaged in commercial arrangements with two international entities: M/s. Amadeus Marketing, a Spanish corporation, and M/s. Galileo International, an American corp...

Ashok Arora v. Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle XIII, New Delhi – Validity of Reassessment Proceedings under Sections 147/148 and Best Judgment Assessment under Section 144 of the Income Tax Act, 1961

Author
My Tax Expert
11/06/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 26
Read More »
Facts of the Case The Income Tax Department issued a notice dated 27 February 2009 under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 seeking to reopen the petitioner’s assessment for Assessment Year 2002-03. ...

Commissioner of Income-Tax, Central-III vs Shilpi Securities Pvt. Ltd. & Connected Assessees – Validity of Search Warrants, Limitation of Block Assessment and Powers under Sections 132 & 158BE of the Income-tax Act | Delhi High Court

Author
My Tax Expert
11/06/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 29
Read More »
Facts of the Case Search and seizure operations were conducted against a group of assessees connected with the same business group. Search warrants were issued authorizing searches of bank accounts,...

Comprehensive Legal Analysis: Commissioner of Income Tax vs. Sahara Airlines Ltd. (2009) – Delhi High Court Judgment on TDS Liability for International Software Usage Payments and DTAA Interpretations under Article 13(2)(ii) of DTAA

Author
My Tax Expert
11/06/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 33
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe respondent, Sahara Airlines Ltd., entered into commercial arrangements with two distinct international entities to facilitate their business operations. These entities included M/s. Amadeus Marketi...

Commissioner of Income Tax vs Goetze (India) Ltd. (2010) 2010:DHC:317-DB | Reassessment under Sections 147/148 Invalid Due to Mere Change of Opinion After Full Disclosure of Material Fact

Author
My Tax Expert
11/06/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 32
Read More »
Facts of the Case The assessee, Goetze (India) Ltd., had claimed prior period expenses amounting to ₹75,96,534. During the original assessment proceedings under Section 143(3), the Assessing Officer re...

Commissioner of Income Tax vs Honda Siel Cars India Ltd. – Allowability of Advertisement & Publicity Expenditure and Royalty Payments as Revenue Expenditure under Section 37(1) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 | Delhi High Court

Author
My Tax Expert
11/06/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 36
Read More »
Facts of the Case The assessee incurred expenditure towards advertisement and publicity for promoting its business activities. The assessee also paid royalty to its Japanese collaborator under the t...