Commissioner of Income Tax-II vs. Jaquar & Co. Ltd. (Delhi High Court) – Penalty under Section 271(1)(c) Not Leviable on Estimated Gross Profit Additions Where Assessee Furnished Bona Fide Explanation

Author
My Tax Expert
09/06/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 36
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe assessee, Jaquar & Co. Ltd., engaged in the business of manufacturing bathroom fittings, was subjected to a search operation. Pursuant to the search, assessment proceedings resulted in: Addi...

Director of Income Tax (Exemption) vs. The Gita Education Society: Scope of Enquiry for Renewal of Section 80G Approval and Bonafide Steps Towards Charitable Objectives

Author
My Tax Expert
09/06/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 27
Read More »
Facts of the Case Formation and Initial Approval: The assessee, The Gita Education Society, is an educational society formed on February 23, 2004. It was granted initial approval under Section 80G of ...

Director of Income Tax (Exemption) vs. M/s Bagri Foundation (Delhi High Court) – Donation out of 15% Accumulation Permissible under Section 11(1)(a); Explanation to Section 11(2) Applies Only to Accumulation Beyond Prescribed Limit

Author
My Tax Expert
09/06/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 12
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe assessee, M/s Bagri Foundation, was a charitable trust duly registered under Section 12AA and recognized under Section 80G(5)(vi) of the Income Tax Act. For Assessment Year 2003-04, it filed its ...

Royal Exports vs Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax (Delhi High Court) – Eligibility of Section 10A Deduction on Interest Earned from Fixed Deposit Receipts (FDRs) Having Nexus with Export Business | ITA No. 730/2010

Author
My Tax Expert
09/06/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 24
Read More »
Facts of the Case The assessee, Royal Exports, was engaged in the business of export of jewellery. During the relevant assessment year, the assessee earned interest of Rs. 8,35,507/- on Fixed Deposit Rec...

CIT vs. Titan Industries Ltd. | Repurchase of Debentures at Discount – Capital Receipt Not Taxable as Income | Delhi High Court

Author
My Tax Expert
09/06/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 30
Read More »
Facts of the Case The assessee, Titan Industries Ltd., was engaged in the manufacture and sale of Quartz and Digital Watches. The company had earlier issued debentures of ₹140 each for raising finance. ...

Commissioner of Income Tax v. Zee Turner Ltd. | Delhi High Court Upholds Bad Debt Write-Off Claim Under Sections 36(1)(vii) and 36(2) of the Income Tax Act

Author
My Tax Expert
09/06/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 26
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe respondent-assessee, Zee Turner Ltd., claimed deduction of ₹69,90,000 as bad debt written off in its accounts for the Assessment Year 2004-05. During assessment proceedings, the Assessing Office...

Commissioner of Income Tax vs. M/s J.K. Synthetics Ltd. (2010) – Depreciation Rate on Cement Manufacturing Plant and Machinery under the Income-tax Act

Author
My Tax Expert
09/06/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 33
Read More »
Facts of the Case The assessee, M/s J.K. Synthetics Ltd., claimed depreciation at the rate of 15% on plant and machinery used in cement manufacturing and packaging activities. The Assessing Officer allow...

Commissioner of Income Tax v. Anuj Gupta | Addition on Estimated Venue Charges Deleted as Tribunal's Findings Based on Facts Raise No Substantial Question of Law | Delhi High Court

Author
My Tax Expert
09/06/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 34
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe assessee, Anuj Gupta, was engaged in the business of providing services relating to entertainment games, catering, venue charges and allied services for parties and events.During assessment procee...

Judicial Scrutiny of Revisionary Powers Under Section 263 of the Income Tax Act: Commissioner of Income Tax vs. Sudhir Thakran & Sukhbir Thakran

Author
My Tax Expert
09/06/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 33
Read More »
Facts of the CaseFollowing a search and seizure operation conducted on November 6, 1996, the Assessing Officer (AO) determined the undisclosed income of the assessees for a block period. The matter reached the Income T...

Commissioner of Income Tax vs. Nikkita Leasing & Finance Ltd. | Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) Cannot Be Sustained Without Proper Opportunity of Hearing – Delhi High Court

Author
My Tax Expert
09/06/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 33
Read More »
Facts of the Case The dispute pertained to Assessment Year 1998-99. Penalty under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 was imposed upon the assessee. The Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) [CIT(A)]...