In M/s
Milroc Good Earth Developers v. Union of India & Others, the Bombay
High Court at Goa considered a significant jurisdictional issue under the CGST
Act, 2017—whether tax authorities are legally permitted t...
The Karnataka High Court, in M/s Pramur
Homes and Shelters v. Union of India & Ors., examined the legality of a
composite show cause notice dated 30 September 2025 issued under Section 74 of
the Central and Karnat...
The Allahabad High Court, in M/s R.T.
Infotech v. Additional Commissioner Grade-II & Ors., examined the
legality of reversal of input tax credit and imposition of tax, interest, and
penalty under Section 73 of the...
The Madras High Court, in M/s D.Y.
Beathel Enterprises v. State Tax Officer, examined whether input tax credit
availed by the purchasing dealers could be denied solely on the ground that the
suppliers had failed to re...
The Calcutta High Court, in LGW
Industries Limited v. Assistant Commissioner of Revenue, State Tax & Ors.,
examined the maintainability of a writ petition challenging an adjudication
order passed under Section 74 ...
The Karnataka High Court, in M/s Kesar
Colour Chem Industries v. The Intelligence Officer & Ors., examined the
legality of recovery of tax amounts during the course of investigation under
the Central Goods and Ser...
The Supreme Court, in Kerala Hotel &
Restaurant Association v. State of Kerala & Ors., examined the
constitutional validity of provisions under the Kerala General Sales Tax Act, 1963
and the Tamil Nadu General...
In M/s
Indeutsch Industries Pvt. Ltd. v. State of Uttar Pradesh & Others, the
Allahabad High Court examined the legality of penalty proceedings initiated
under Section 129 of the U.P. Goods and Services Tax Act, 2...
The Allahabad High Court, in M/s BMR Enterprises
v. State of Uttar Pradesh & Ors., examined the legality of a penalty
imposed under Section 129(3) of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017,
on account of a d...
The Delhi High Court, in Best Crop
Science Pvt. Ltd. v. Principal Commissioner, CGST Commissionerate, Meerut &
Ors., considered a batch of writ petitions challenging orders passed under
Rule 86A of the Central Goo...