Facts of the Case
The petitioner, Gain Capital Private Limited,
filed a writ petition impugning the order dated 25.07.2022 passed under Section
148A(d) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 and the consequential notice dated
27.07.2022 issued under Section 148 for Assessment Year 2015–16. The petitioner
had filed its return of income for AY 2015–16 on 22.09.2015 declaring a loss.
The Assessing Officer issued a notice dated
30.06.2021 under Section 148 under the unamended reassessment regime without
following the procedure prescribed under Section 148A. Thereafter, by
communication dated 16.05.2022, relying on the Supreme Court decision in Union
of India & Ors. vs. Ashish Agarwal, the earlier notice was treated as a
notice under Section 148A(b) and information was furnished to the petitioner.
The petitioner responded on 01.06.2022. Subsequently, the Assessing Officer
passed the impugned order under Section 148A(d) and issued the notice dated
27.07.2022 under Section 148.
Issues Involved
Whether reassessment proceedings for Assessment
Year 2015–16 initiated pursuant to notices issued on or after 1 April 2021 were
liable to be dropped in view of the concession made by the Revenue before the
Supreme Court in Union of India vs. Rajeev Bansal, and whether the impugned
notice under Section 148 could be sustained in law.
Petitioner’s Arguments
The petitioner contended that the impugned
proceedings were squarely covered by the concession recorded by the Supreme
Court in Union of India vs. Rajeev Bansal, wherein the Revenue conceded that
for Assessment Year 2015–16, all notices issued on or after 1 April 2021 would
have to be dropped as they would not fall for completion during the period
prescribed under the Taxation and Other Laws (Relaxation and Amendment of
Certain Provisions) Act, 2020. Since the notice under Section 148 was issued on
27.07.2022, it was argued to be ex facie unsustainable.
Respondent’s Arguments
The Revenue did not dispute the applicability of
the concession recorded in Union of India vs. Rajeev Bansal. The Court was also
referred to the subsequent decision of the Supreme Court in Deepak Steel and
Power Ltd. vs. Central Board of Direct Taxes, wherein the same concession was
applied to allow appeals arising from similar reassessment notices.
Court Order / Findings
The Delhi High Court referred to paragraphs 19(e)
and 19(f) of the Supreme Court decision in Union of India vs. Rajeev Bansal,
recording the clear concession by the Revenue that for Assessment Year 2015–16,
all notices issued on or after 1 April 2021 were liable to be dropped. The
Court also relied on the Supreme Court’s decision in Deepak Steel and Power
Ltd., which reiterated and applied the same concession.
The Court noted that the issue was also covered by
its own decision in MakeMyTrip India Pvt. Ltd. vs. Deputy Commissioner of
Income Tax, Circle 16(1), Delhi & Anr. In view of the settled legal
position, the Court held that the impugned notice and proceedings could not be
sustained.
Important Clarification
The Court clarified that once the Revenue has
conceded before the Supreme Court that reassessment notices for a particular
assessment year issued after a specified date are liable to be dropped, such
concession is binding and must be uniformly applied by all authorities and
courts without reopening the issue on merits.
Final Outcome
The writ petition was allowed. The Delhi High
Court quashed the impugned notice dated 27.07.2022 issued under Section 148 of
the Income-tax Act, 1961 for Assessment Year 2015–16 and set aside all
proceedings initiated pursuant thereto. All pending applications were disposed
of accordingly.
Link to download the order - https://www.mytaxexpert.co.in/uploads/1769676500_GAINCAPITALPRIVATELIMITEDVsASSISTANTCOMMISSIONEROFINCOMETAXOSDANR..pdf
Disclaimer
This content is shared strictly for general
information and knowledge purposes only. Readers should independently verify
the information from reliable sources. It is not intended to provide legal,
professional, or advisory guidance. The author and the organisation disclaim
all liability arising from the use of this content. The material has been
prepared with the assistance of AI tools.
0 Comments
Leave a Comment