Facts of the
Case
The petitioner,
Swadeshi Tubes Ltd., filed a writ petition relating to Assessment Year 2014–15
challenging the foundational notice dated 29.06.2021 issued under Section 148
of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (unamended law), the subsequent notice dated
26.05.2022 issued under Section 148A(b), the order dated 27.07.2022 passed
under Section 148A(d), and the consequential notice dated 27.07.2022 issued
under Section 148.
The petitioner
contended that the notices and the order were jurisdictionally flawed,
time-barred under Section 149, contrary to Section 151A and CBDT notification
dated 29 March 2022, based on vague and extraneous material, and passed in
violation of principles of natural justice, including denial of oral hearing
and cross-examination.
Issues Involved
Whether the
reassessment proceedings initiated for Assessment Year 2014–15 were barred by
limitation under Section 149 in light of settled judicial precedents, whether
the impugned notices and order under Sections 148 and 148A were sustainable,
and whether the matter required reconsideration by the Assessing Officer
applying the correct legal position.
Petitioner’s
Arguments
The petitioner
submitted that the issue stood covered by the settled position of law laid down
by the Supreme Court in Union of India vs. Rajeev Bansal, by the Delhi
High Court in Ram Balram Buildhome Pvt. Ltd. vs. Income Tax Officer, and
by the Madhya Pradesh High Court in Sandeep Singh Saluja vs. Income Tax
Department. It was argued that applying the settled legal position to the
facts of the case, the impugned notices dated 29.06.2021 and 26.05.2022, the
order dated 27.07.2022, and the consequential notice were liable to be set
aside.
Respondent’s
Arguments
The Revenue
submitted that instead of quashing the reassessment proceedings outright, the
appropriate course would be to remand the matter to the Assessing Officer to
enable him to independently apply his mind to the facts arising for
consideration and to pass appropriate orders keeping in view the settled
position of law.
Court Order /
Findings
The Delhi High
Court noted that the controversy raised by the petitioner required examination
in light of the settled legal position laid down by the Supreme Court in Union
of India vs. Rajeev Bansal and followed by the Delhi High Court in Ram
Balram Buildhome Pvt. Ltd. The Court also took note of the order passed by
the Supreme Court in Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax vs. Reliance
Industries Limited, wherein a similar course of remand had been adopted.
Accepting the
submission of the Revenue, the Court held that the appropriate course would be
to remand the matter to the Assessing Officer. The Court directed the
petitioner to submit before the Assessing Officer the chart that had been filed
before the Court, and directed the Assessing Officer to grant a hearing and
thereafter pass appropriate orders in accordance with law.
Important
Clarification
The Court
clarified that while reconsidering the matter, the Assessing Officer shall
independently apply his mind to the facts of the case and the settled legal
position relating to limitation, and shall not be influenced by the earlier
impugned notices or order passed under Section 148A(d).
Final Outcome
The writ petition
was disposed of. The matter was remanded to the Assessing Officer, who was
directed to grant a hearing to the petitioner and pass appropriate orders
within four weeks as an outer limit after the petitioner submits the requisite
chart. All pending applications, if any, were disposed of accordingly.
Link to
Download Order- https://www.mytaxexpert.co.in/uploads/1769595617_SWADESHITUBESLTD.VsASSISTANTCOMMISSIONEROFINCOMETAXCIRCLE222NEWDELHI.pdf
Disclaimer
This content is shared strictly for general information and knowledge purposes only. Readers should independently verify the information from reliable sources. It is not intended to provide legal, professional, or advisory guidance. The author and the organisation disclaim all liability arising from the use of this content. The material has been prepared with the assistance of AI tools.
0 Comments
Leave a Comment