Facts
of the Case
The
Revenue filed an appeal under Section 260A of the Income-tax Act, 1961, being
ITA No. 542/2025, challenging the common order dated 08.02.2023 passed by the
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal. The Tribunal had allowed the assessee’s appeal
arising out of search and seizure proceedings and quashed the assessments for
the relevant assessment years, namely AYs 2006-07, 2007-08 and 2008-09.
The
ITAT held that the mandatory approval granted under Section 153D of the Act by
the Additional Commissioner was mechanical, omnibus and without application of
mind. The approval was issued through a stereotyped letter covering a very
large number of draft assessment orders, without any reference to seized
material or assessment records.
Issues
Involved
Whether
approvals granted under Section 153D of the Income-tax Act in a mechanical
manner without due application of mind are valid, whether such defective
approvals vitiate the consequent search assessments, and whether any
substantial question of law arose for consideration under Section 260A.
Appellant’s
Arguments (Revenue)
The
Revenue submitted that the questions raised in the appeal were similar to those
raised in other connected appeals arising from the same ITAT order dated
08.02.2023. It was fairly conceded that the issues stood covered by earlier
decisions of the Delhi High Court in Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax, Central
Circle-02 vs. MDLR Hotels Pvt. Ltd. and Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax,
Central-2 vs. King Buildcon Pvt. Ltd., which had affirmed the Tribunal’s
view on invalid mechanical approvals under Section 153D.
Respondent’s
Arguments (Assessee)
The
assessee relied upon the binding precedents of the Delhi High Court holding
that Section 153D approval is a substantive statutory safeguard and cannot be reduced
to a ritualistic or mechanical formality. It was contended that grant of
approval without examination of seized material or assessment records defeats
the legislative intent and renders the assessment void.
Court
Order / Findings
The
Delhi High Court noted that the Revenue itself admitted that the issues
involved were covered by earlier judgments of the Court. The Court reiterated
that approvals granted under Section 153D must reflect conscious application of
mind by the approving authority and cannot be accorded in a blanket manner
through a single stereotyped approval covering numerous draft assessment
orders.
Relying
on its earlier decisions in MDLR Hotels Pvt. Ltd. and King Buildcon
Pvt. Ltd., the Court held that mechanical and omnibus approvals under
Section 153D are invalid and vitiate the entire assessment proceedings. The
Court further observed that similar principles governing application of mind
apply to approvals under Sections 151 and 153D of the Act.
Finding
no substantial question of law arising from the ITAT’s order, the Court
declined to interfere.
Important
Clarification
The
High Court clarified that the question relating to the effect and impact of
Section 144A of the Income-tax Act and the provisions of the Search and Seizure
Manual, 2007, was left open to be examined in appropriate proceedings,
consistent with earlier judgments.
Final
Outcome
The
appeal filed by Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax-1 against Believe
Constructions Pvt. Ltd. was dismissed. The Delhi High Court upheld
the ITAT’s order quashing the search assessments on the ground that the approval
under Section 153D was mechanical and invalid, and held that no
substantial question of law arose for consideration. The appeal was
dismissed in favour of the assessee and against the Revenue.
Link
to Download Order- https://www.mytaxexpert.co.in/uploads/1769505922_PR.COMMISSIONEROFINCOMETAX1VsBELIEVECONSTRUCTIONSP.LTD.pdf
Disclaimer
This content is shared strictly for general information and knowledge purposes only. Readers should independently verify the information from reliable sources. It is not intended to provide legal, professional, or advisory guidance. The author and the organisation disclaim all liability arising from the use of this content. The material has been prepared with the assistance of AI tools.
0 Comments
Leave a Comment