Facts of the Case
The Revenue filed an appeal under Section 260A of the
Income-tax Act, 1961 challenging the order dated 09.02.2024 passed by the
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal in ITA No. 2855/Del/2023 for Assessment Year
2021–22. The Tribunal had allowed the assessee’s appeal by deleting additions
made by the Assessing Officer in respect of various receipts earned by the
non-resident assessee, Expeditors International of Washington Inc., a US-based
logistics company.
The Assessing Officer had treated receipts from sale of
logistic support services, reimbursement of global account management charges,
and reimbursement of lease line charges as taxable in India, characterising
them as Fees for Technical Services or Fees for Included Services under the
Income-tax Act and the India–USA DTAA, and as royalty in respect of lease line
charges. The additions aggregated to substantial amounts running into hundreds
of crores.
Issues Involved
Whether receipts from logistic support services are taxable as
Fees for Technical Services or Fees for Included Services, whether
reimbursements of global account management charges partake the character of
FTS/FIS, whether lease line charges are taxable as royalty under the Act or the
India–USA DTAA, and whether the Tribunal erred in deleting the additions by
relying on earlier years’ decisions.
Appellant’s Arguments
The Revenue challenged the Tribunal’s reliance on its own
decisions in earlier assessment years and contended that the nature of services
rendered by the assessee involved technical and managerial elements bringing
the receipts within the ambit of FTS/FIS. It was argued that the Tribunal
mechanically followed earlier orders without independently examining the facts
of the year under consideration.
Respondent’s Arguments
The assessee submitted that the issues were recurring and had
been consistently decided in its favour by the Tribunal from Assessment Year
2010–11 onwards. It was argued that there was no change either in facts or in
law for Assessment Year 2021–22. The assessee further submitted that the
Revenue itself had accepted that the issues stood covered by binding
precedents, including earlier judgments of the Delhi High Court in the
assessee’s own case.
Court Order / Findings
The Delhi High Court noted that the Tribunal, from paragraph 6
onwards of its order, had recorded detailed findings that all issues raised for
Assessment Year 2021–22 were identical to those decided in favour of the
assessee in preceding assessment years. The Court took note of the Revenue’s
fair concession that the Tribunal’s reliance on its earlier orders could not be
contested.
The Court further noted that the Tribunal’s earlier orders for
various assessment years had already been examined by the Delhi High Court in a
batch of nine appeals, decided by a common judgment dated 13.02.2025, with the
lead case being Commissioner of Income Tax (International Taxation)-1, New
Delhi vs. Expeditors International of Washington Inc., wherein the High Court
had declined to interfere with the Tribunal’s findings.
In view of the settled position and absence of any change in
facts or law, the Court held that no substantial question of law arose from the
Tribunal’s order for Assessment Year 2021–22.
Important Clarification
The Court clarified that where an issue has been consistently
decided in favour of an assessee in earlier years and such decisions have
attained finality up to the High Court level, the principle of consistency
applies with full force. In the absence of any distinguishing facts or contrary
binding precedent, the Revenue cannot seek re-agitation of the same issues year
after year.
Final Outcome
The appeal filed by the Revenue was dismissed. The Delhi High
Court held that no substantial question of law arose for consideration and upheld
the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal deleting additions relating to
logistic support services, reimbursement of global account management charges,
and lease line charges for Assessment Year 2021–22.
Link to download order- https://www.mytaxexpert.co.in/uploads/1769506644_THECOMMISSIONEROFINCOMETAXINTERNATIONALTAXATION1NEWDELHIVsEXPEDITORSINTERNATIONALOFWASHINGTONINC..pdf
Disclaimer
This content is shared strictly for general information and
knowledge purposes only. Readers should independently verify the information
from reliable sources. It is not intended to provide legal, professional, or
advisory guidance. The author and the organisation disclaim all liability
arising from the use of this content. The material has been prepared with the
assistance of AI tools.
0 Comments
Leave a Comment