Facts
of the Case
The
petitioner, Harshit Finvest Pvt. Ltd., a Non-Banking Financial Company
registered with the Reserve Bank of India, challenged the order dated
30.06.2025 passed under Section 148A(3) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 and the
consequential notice issued under Section 148 for Assessment Year 2021–22. The
petitioner’s return for the relevant year had earlier been processed under
Section 143(1). Reassessment proceedings were initiated on the basis of
information received from the Investigation Wing alleging escapement of income
amounting to ₹6.75 crores, purportedly linked to accommodation entry
transactions routed through M/s ITJ Retails Pvt. Ltd. and M/s Ashutosh Traders.
Issues
Involved
Whether
the High Court should interfere with reassessment proceedings at the stage of
Section 148A where the Assessing Officer has passed a speaking order, whether
there was independent application of mind or merely borrowed satisfaction from
investigation reports, and whether the alleged escapement of income was
supported by tangible material justifying issuance of notice under Section 148.
Petitioner’s
Arguments
The
petitioner contended that it had no direct or indirect dealings with M/s
Ashutosh Traders and that its transactions with M/s ITJ Retails Pvt. Ltd. were
purely financial in nature and duly reflected in audited accounts and bank
statements. It was argued that the Investigation Wing report contained factual
inaccuracies and that the alleged escapement of ₹6.75 crores was
disproportionate to the alleged entry of ₹18.92 lakhs. The petitioner further
submitted that sanction under Section 151 was accorded mechanically and that
selective action against the petitioner, without initiating proceedings against
M/s ITJ Retails Pvt. Ltd., rendered the reassessment proceedings arbitrary and
violative of Article 14 of the Constitution.
Respondent’s
Arguments
The
Revenue submitted that the order passed under Section 148A(3) was a detailed
and reasoned order dealing with each contention raised by the petitioner. It was
argued that independent verification was conducted by issuance of notice under
Section 133(6) to M/s ITJ Retails Pvt. Ltd., pursuant to which bank statements
were obtained revealing transactions with M/s Ashutosh Traders, thereby
corroborating the Investigation Wing inputs. The Revenue contended that the
reassessment proceedings were based on credible material and involved disputed
questions of fact which could not be adjudicated in writ jurisdiction.
Court
Order / Findings
The
Delhi High Court examined the impugned order passed under Section 148A(3) and
noted that the Assessing Officer had undertaken extensive independent
verification, including issuance of notice under Section 133(6), examination of
bank statements, and comparative analysis of conflicting statements. The Court
held that the order was a speaking order demonstrating independent application
of mind and could not be characterised as being based on borrowed satisfaction.
Relying on the Supreme Court judgment in Principal Director of Income Tax
(Investigation) vs. Laljibhai Kanjibhai Mandalia, the Court reiterated that at
the stage of reassessment initiation, the sufficiency or adequacy of reasons
cannot be examined in writ proceedings, and judicial review is limited to
examining existence of jurisdictional facts.
Important
Clarification
The
Court clarified that at the stage of issuance of notice under Section 148, the
Assessing Officer is only required to form a prima facie belief regarding
escapement of income based on tangible material, and not to conclusively
establish such escapement. All contentions on merits were left open to be urged
by the petitioner during reassessment proceedings.
Final
Outcome
The
writ petition was dismissed. The order dated 30.06.2025 passed under Section
148A(3) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 and the consequential notice issued under
Section 148 for Assessment Year 2021–22 were upheld, with liberty to the
petitioner to raise all permissible pleas before the Assessing Officer during
reassessment proceedings.
Link
to Download Order- https://www.mytaxexpert.co.in/uploads/1769502649_HARSHITFINVESTPVTLTDVsASSISTANTCOMMISSIONEROFINCOMETAXCIRCLE101NEWDELHIANR..pdf
Disclaimer
This content is shared strictly for general information and knowledge purposes only. Readers should independently verify the information from reliable sources. It is not intended to provide legal, professional, or advisory guidance. The author and the organisation disclaim all liability arising from the use of this content. The material has been prepared with the assistance of AI tools.
0 Comments
Leave a Comment