Facts
of the Case
The
petitioner, Delhi Maharashtriya Educational and Cultural Society, is a society
registered under the Societies Registration Act, 1860 and engaged in charitable
and welfare activities. For Assessment Year 2018-19, the petitioner filed its
return of income on 31.10.2018 within the extended due date, declaring Nil
income after claiming exemption under Sections 11 and 12 of the Income-tax Act.
The audit report in Form 10B was prepared on 30.09.2018 but could not be
uploaded along with the return due to an inadvertent error on the part of the
auditor/tax professional. Upon realising the omission, the petitioner uploaded
Form 10B on 16.11.2018, resulting in a delay of 16 days.
While
processing the return under Section 143(1), the exemption under Sections 11 and
12 was denied solely on account of delay in filing Form 10B, creating a demand
of ₹2,23,53,562. Rectification under Section 154 was also rejected. The
petitioner thereafter filed an application under Section 119(2)(b) seeking condonation
of delay, which was rejected by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemptions) on
14.06.2024 on the ground that auditor’s error did not constitute reasonable
cause. The petitioner approached the Delhi High Court.
Issues
Involved
Whether
a delay of 16 days in filing audit report in Form 10B caused due to inadvertent
professional error constitutes “genuine hardship” under Section 119(2)(b),
whether rejection of condonation application on technical grounds was
justified, and whether substantive exemption under Sections 11 and 12 could be
denied for such minor procedural lapse.
Petitioner’s
Arguments
The
petitioner contended that it is a long-standing charitable society with a
consistent history of compliance and no allegation of mala fides. It was submitted
that the return of income was filed within time, the audit was completed within
the prescribed period, and Form 10B was uploaded before any assessment
proceedings commenced. The delay was purely inadvertent and attributable to
professional error. Reliance was placed on several High Court and Supreme Court
judgments holding that procedural lapses should not defeat substantive
charitable exemptions.
Respondent’s
Arguments
The
Revenue contended that statutory timelines must be strictly adhered to and that
mere attribution of delay to an auditor’s mistake does not automatically
establish genuine hardship. Reliance was placed on precedents emphasising
discipline in statutory compliance and the need to explain delay with cogent
reasons.
Court
Order / Findings
The
Delhi High Court held that the facts clearly demonstrated a bona fide mistake
resulting in a marginal delay of 16 days in uploading Form 10B. The Court
observed that the return was filed within time, reference to the audit report
was made in the return, and the audit report itself was prepared within the
prescribed period. The Court held that an assessee, particularly a charitable
institution, should not be made to suffer for an inadvertent professional
error. Relying on consistent judicial precedents, including decisions of the
Supreme Court and various High Courts, the Court held that the approach under
Section 119(2)(b) must be equitable, balancing and judicious, and that denial
of condonation in such cases would defeat the benevolent object of the statute.
The rejection order dated 14.06.2024 was therefore held to be unsustainable.
Important
Clarification
The
Court clarified that filing of Form 10B is a procedural requirement intended to
facilitate assessment. Where audit is completed in time and delay in uploading
the report is marginal, bona fide and without mala fides, denial of exemption
under Sections 11 and 12 on such technical grounds causes genuine hardship and
warrants exercise of powers under Section 119(2)(b).
Final
Outcome
The
writ petition was allowed. The order dated 14.06.2024 rejecting condonation
under Section 119(2)(b) was set aside. The authorities were directed to pass a
fresh order on the petitioner’s application for condonation of delay in filing
Form 10B within eight weeks and thereafter proceed in accordance with law.
Link
to Download Order- https://www.mytaxexpert.co.in/uploads/1769502292_DELHIMAHARASHTRIYAEDUCATIONALANDCULTURALSOCIETYTHROUGHAUTHORISEDREPRESENTATIVEVsCOMMISSIONEROFINCOMETAXEXEMPTIONSDELHI.pdf
Disclaimer
This content is shared strictly for general information and knowledge purposes only. Readers should independently verify the information from reliable sources. It is not intended to provide legal, professional, or advisory guidance. The author and the organisation disclaim all liability arising from the use of this content. The material has been prepared with the assistance of AI tools.
0 Comments
Leave a Comment