Facts
of the Case
The
respondent, Hyundai Rotem Company, is a foreign company incorporated in Korea
and engaged in manufacturing railway rolling stock and related systems. For
Assessment Year 2018-19, the assessee filed its return declaring total income
of ₹13,64,92,120. The case was selected for scrutiny and referred to the
Transfer Pricing Officer, who proposed an upward adjustment of ₹7,36,34,508 on
account of provision of administrative support services. The Assessing Officer
passed a draft assessment order, against which the assessee filed objections
before the Dispute Resolution Panel. The DRP issued its directions on
24.05.2022, which were uploaded on the ITBA portal on 26.05.2022. Pursuant to
the revised transfer pricing adjustment, the Assessing Officer passed the final
assessment order on 01.07.2022. The ITAT allowed the assessee’s appeal holding
the final assessment order to be barred by limitation under Section 144C(13).
Aggrieved, the Revenue preferred an appeal before the Delhi High Court under
Section 260A.
Issues
Involved
Whether
the limitation period prescribed under Section 144C(13) for passing the final
assessment order commences from the date of uploading of DRP directions on the
ITBA portal or from the date of physical receipt of the DRP order by the
Assessing Officer, and whether the assessment order dated 01.07.2022 was barred
by limitation.
Petitioner’s
Arguments
The
Revenue contended that the assessee was assessed under International Taxation
and therefore outside the Faceless Assessment Scheme. It was argued that
limitation under Section 144C(13) should be computed from the date on which the
Assessing Officer physically received the DRP directions, which according to
the Revenue was 01.06.2022, and therefore the final assessment order dated
01.07.2022 was within time. The Revenue further argued that mere uploading of
DRP directions on the ITBA portal does not amount to “receipt” by the Assessing
Officer.
Respondent’s
Arguments
The
assessee contended that DRP directions were uploaded on the ITBA portal on
26.05.2022 and were immediately available and accessible to the Assessing
Officer. Relying on Section 13 of the Information Technology Act, the
E-Assessment Scheme, and consistent judicial precedents, it was argued that
electronic upload constitutes valid receipt. Accordingly, the limitation period
expired on 30.06.2022, rendering the final assessment order dated 01.07.2022
void and time-barred.
Court
Order / Findings
The
Delhi High Court observed that the issue was no longer res integra and was
squarely covered by its earlier decision in Louis Dreyfus Company India Private
Limited as well as judgments of the Bombay, Madras, Karnataka and Telangana
High Courts. The Court held that once DRP directions are uploaded on the ITBA
portal with a Document Identification Number, they are deemed to be received by
the Assessing Officer on the same date. The plea of the Revenue that limitation
should commence from the date of physical receipt was rejected as
inconsequential in the electronic assessment regime. The Court further held
that Section 144C is a self-contained code and the limitation prescribed
therein is mandatory. Since the DRP directions were uploaded on 26.05.2022, the
Assessing Officer was required to pass the final assessment order by
30.06.2022. The order passed on 01.07.2022 was therefore barred by limitation
and void ab initio. No substantial question of law arose for consideration.
Important
Clarification
The
High Court clarified that internal administrative delays or modes of physical
transmission cannot extend statutory limitation. Uploading of DRP directions on
the ITBA portal constitutes valid receipt for the purposes of Section 144C(13),
including in cases of International Taxation. Procedural lapses within the
Department cannot operate to the detriment of the assessee.
Final
Outcome
The
appeal filed by the Revenue was dismissed. The order of the ITAT quashing the
final assessment order dated 01.07.2022 as time-barred under Section 144C(13)
was upheld.
Link to Download Order- https://www.mytaxexpert.co.in/uploads/1769502247_COMMISSIONEROFINCOMETAXINTERNATIONALTAXATION2NEWDELHIVsHYUNDAIROTEMCOMPANY.pdf
Disclaimer
This
content is shared strictly for general information and knowledge purposes only.
Readers should independently verify the information from reliable sources. It
is not intended to provide legal, professional, or advisory guidance. The
author and the organisation disclaim all liability arising from the use of this
content. The material has been prepared with the assistance of AI tools.
0 Comments
Leave a Comment