Facts of the
Case
The petitioner, M/s Ganga Enterprises, challenged
an Order-in-Original dated 28th August, 2024 confirming a demand of ₹97,53,080
along with interest and penalties for the tax period April 2019 to March 2020.
The firm is a sole proprietorship owned by Mrs. Chakresh Jain, a widow and
senior citizen aged above 75 years, holding a dealership agreement with
Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Limited for supply of domestic and commercial
LPG.
A notice in Form GST ASMT-10 dated 5th April, 2024
was issued alleging short payment of tax on account of mismatch between GSTR-1
and GSTR-3B returns. A show cause notice dated 29th May, 2024 was thereafter
issued under Section 73(1) of the CGST Act. Despite issuance of multiple
personal hearing notices, no reply was filed and no appearance was made,
resulting in an ex parte adjudication order.
Issues
Involved
Whether the ex parte adjudication order confirming
GST demand could be sustained when the proprietor was prevented from responding
due to serious medical conditions, whether the matter deserved remand in the
interest of natural justice, and whether relief could be granted while the validity
of Notification Nos. 9 and 56 of 2023 issued under Section 168A of the CGST Act
was pending consideration before the Supreme Court.
Petitioner’s
Arguments
The petitioner contended that the sole proprietor
was suffering from acute kidney-related medical conditions since 2022, which
incapacitated her from filing replies or attending personal hearings. It was
submitted that the failure to respond was not deliberate and that the matter
deserved reconsideration on merits. Reliance was placed on decisions of the
Delhi High Court granting relief in similar circumstances where adjudication
orders were passed ex parte.
Respondent’s
Arguments
The Revenue submitted that the petitioner had been
duly served with notices and multiple opportunities of personal hearing were
granted. It was contended that the adjudication order was passed in accordance
with law and that no reply had been filed despite sufficient opportunities.
Court Order
/ Findings
The Delhi High Court observed that the petitioner’s
failure to respond was attributable to serious medical conditions of the senior
citizen proprietor. Following its earlier decision in Sugandha Enterprises v.
Commissioner, DGST, the Court held that the matter deserved reconsideration on
merits to uphold principles of natural justice. At the same time, the Court
noted that repeated opportunities had been granted and therefore imposed costs
as a condition for granting relief.
The Court refrained from examining the validity of
Notification Nos. 9 and 56 of 2023 issued under Section 168A of the CGST Act,
keeping the issue open in view of pending proceedings before the Supreme Court.
Important
Clarification
The High Court clarified that the impugned
adjudication order was being set aside without examination of the merits of the
demand and that all rights and remedies of the parties were left open. It was
further clarified that any fresh adjudication would be subject to the outcome
of proceedings pending before the Supreme Court concerning the validity of
limitation extension notifications.
Final
Outcome
The writ petition was allowed subject to payment of
costs of ₹1,00,000 to the Delhi High Court Bar Association. The impugned
Order-in-Original dated 28th August, 2024 was set aside. The petitioner was
permitted to file a reply to the show cause notice by 15th December, 2025,
after which a personal hearing was directed to be granted and a fresh reasoned
order passed in accordance with law.
SOURCE LINK: https://delhihighcourt.nic.in/app/showFileJudgment/75418112025CW167412025_180005.pdf
Disclaimer
This content is shared strictly for general
information and knowledge purposes only. Readers should independently verify
the information from reliable sources. It is not intended to provide legal,
professional, or advisory guidance. The author and the organisation disclaim
all liability arising from the use of this content. The material has been
prepared with the assistance of AI tools.
0 Comments
Leave a Comment