Facts of the Case
The
assessee, Sunil Piyush Shah, an individual, filed his return of income for
Assessment Year 2019-20 declaring total income of ₹9,73,730 after claiming
deduction of ₹1,05,000, including ₹1,00,000 under Section 80GGC towards
donation to Manvadhikar National Party. Based on information received from
DCIT, Central Circle-2(3), Ahmedabad, it was alleged that the assessee was a
beneficiary of bogus donations routed through the said political party. A
search and seizure action under Section 132 was conducted on 02.02.2021 in
cases of various political parties and charitable organisations, during which
the National President of Manvadhikar National Party admitted in a statement
under Section 132(4) that the party was engaged in providing accommodation
entries by way of bogus donations.
Reassessment
proceedings were initiated and notice under Section 148A(b) along with order
under Section 148A(d) dated 02.05.2023 was issued. After considering the reply
of the assessee, the Assessing Officer completed reassessment under Section 147
read with Section 144B and disallowed the deduction of ₹1,00,000 claimed under
Section 80GGC, holding the donation to be bogus. The CIT(A), NFAC dismissed the
assessee’s appeal. Aggrieved, the assessee preferred an appeal before the
Tribunal.
Issues Involved
Whether
the reassessment proceedings initiated under Sections 147 and 148A were valid
in law, whether denial of opportunity to cross-examine third-party witnesses
vitiated the reassessment, and whether deduction claimed under Section 80GGC
towards donation to a political party was allowable on facts.
Petitioner’s Arguments
The
assessee contended that the reassessment proceedings were void ab initio as no
incriminating material specific to him was furnished and he was not granted
opportunity to cross-examine the persons whose statements were relied upon. It
was argued that Manvadhikar National Party was duly registered under the
Representation of the People Act and therefore donation to the said party was
eligible for deduction under Section 80GGC. The assessee also challenged
initiation of penalty proceedings under Section 270A and denial of immunity
under Section 270AA.
Respondent’s Arguments
The
Revenue relied upon the assessment order and the order of the CIT(A),
contending that reassessment proceedings were initiated after following due
procedure under Section 148A and that the disallowance was based on
investigation findings and the conduct of the assessee, not merely on
third-party statements.
Court Order / Findings
The ITAT
Ahmedabad observed that the notice issued under Section 148A(b) and the
consequential order under Section 148A(d) dated 02.05.2023 clearly recorded the
information received from the Investigation Wing and that the assessee was
granted opportunity to respond. The Tribunal noted that the Assessing Officer
had not relied solely on third-party statements but also considered the conduct
of the assessee, as recorded in the reassessment order.
On
merits, the Tribunal observed that the assessee failed to furnish any cogent
evidence either before the Assessing Officer or before the CIT(A) to establish
the genuineness of the donation or to rebut the findings that the amount
donated was returned in cash after deduction of commission. In the absence of
any material to substantiate the claim, the Tribunal held that the disallowance
of deduction under Section 80GGC was justified. Accordingly, the Tribunal
upheld the reassessment and the order of the CIT(A).
Important Clarification
The
Tribunal clarified that where reassessment proceedings are initiated after
following due procedure under Section 148A and the assessee fails to
substantiate the genuineness of political donations found to be accommodation
entries based on investigation findings, deduction under Section 80GGC cannot
be allowed merely on the basis of registration status of the political party.
Final Outcome
The
appeal filed by the assessee was dismissed. The disallowance of ₹1,00,000
claimed under Section 80GGC was upheld and the reassessment order stood
confirmed.
Link to download order https://www.mytaxexpert.co.in/uploads/1769151326_SUNILPIYUSHSHAHAHMEDABADVS.NFACDELHIPRESENTJURIS.THEITOWARD.pdf
Disclaimer
This content is shared strictly for general
information and knowledge purposes only. Readers should independently verify
the information from reliable sources. It is not intended to provide legal,
professional, or advisory guidance. The author and the organisation disclaim
all liability arising from the use of this content. The material has been
prepared with the assistance of AI tools.
0 Comments
Leave a Comment