Facts of the
Case
The assessee, Almahad Trust, filed its return of
income for Assessment Year 2013-14. Based on information from the e-filing
portal, the Assessing Officer noted cash deposits of ₹21,84,076 in a bank
account maintained with J & K Bank and issued notice under Section 148 of
the Income-tax Act. In response, the assessee filed a return of income on 13.04.2021.
Thereafter, notices under Section 143(2) and other statutory notices were
issued. According to the Assessing Officer, there was no compliance and the
assessee failed to furnish registration under Section 12A or approval under
Section 80G. Consequently, exemption under Section 11 was denied and the entire
cash deposit was treated as income. The CIT(A) remanded the matter to the
Assessing Officer for verification. The assessee filed appeal before the
Tribunal with a delay of 355 days.
Issues Involved
Whether the delay in filing the appeal deserved
condonation, whether the entire gross cash receipts could be taxed without
examining net income, whether the source of cash deposits required fresh
examination, and whether the matter warranted remand for de novo adjudication
in accordance with law.
Petitioner’s
Arguments
The assessee submitted that the delay in filing the
appeal was due to a bona fide belief that the Assessing Officer would compute
income on a net basis pursuant to the remand by the CIT(A). It was contended
that the trust was engaged in charitable and educational activities and that
voluntary contributions deposited in the bank account could not be taxed on a
gross basis. The assessee argued that as per settled law, only net income can be
subjected to tax and that the authorities below erred in treating the entire
cash deposits as income without considering expenditure incurred for charitable
activities. It was therefore requested that the matter be remanded for fresh
consideration.
Respondent’s
Arguments
The Revenue relied on the orders of the lower
authorities and contended that the assessee failed to explain the source of
cash deposits. It was argued that unless the assessee first establishes the
nature and source of receipts in accordance with the provisions of the Act, no
relief can be granted, and opposed granting further opportunity.
Court Order
/ Findings
The ITAT Patna condoned the delay in filing the
appeal after considering the affidavit and relying on judicial precedents,
including the decision of the Supreme Court in Collector, Land Acquisition vs.
Mst. Katiji. On merits, the Tribunal observed that while income tax is
chargeable on net income and not on gross receipts, the assessee had failed to
properly explain the source of cash deposits. Considering the facts and in the
interest of justice, the Tribunal held that the issue required fresh
examination. Accordingly, the matter was remitted to the file of the Assessing
Officer for de novo consideration with a direction to compute taxable income on
a net basis as per law after granting reasonable opportunity to the assessee.
Important
Clarification
The Tribunal clarified that while taxation must be
on net income and not on gross receipts, the assessee is under an obligation to
satisfactorily explain the source and nature of cash deposits. Failure to
substantiate the claim with cogent evidence may disentitle the assessee from
relief. Adequate opportunity must, however, be provided before drawing adverse
conclusions.
Final
Outcome
The appeal filed by the assessee was allowed for
statistical purposes, the delay was condoned, and the matter was remanded to
the Assessing Officer for de novo adjudication in accordance with law after
providing due opportunity of hearing to the assessee.
Link to download order https://www.mytaxexpert.co.in/uploads/1769072605_ALMAHADTRUSTPATNAVS.ITOEXEMPTIONWARD1PATNAPATNA.pdf
Disclaimer
This content is shared strictly for general information and knowledge purposes only. Readers should independently verify the information from reliable sources. It is not intended to provide legal, professional, or advisory guidance. The author and the organisation disclaim all liability arising from the use of this content. The material has been prepared with the assistance of AI tools.
0 Comments
Leave a Comment