Facts of the Case
The assessee, Mangal Jivan Trust, a
charitable trust located at Sedrana, District Patan, filed its return of income
for Assessment Year 2023-24 declaring Nil income after claiming exemption under
Sections 11 and 12 of the Income-tax Act. The trust held a valid registration
under Section 12A for the relevant period.
The assessment was reopened and completed
under Section 147, wherein the Assessing Officer denied exemption under
Sections 11 and 12 and assessed income at ₹18,23,367. The denial was based on
non-furnishing of information relating to payments towards fixed assets and
payments to specified persons.
On appeal, the Commissioner of Income Tax
(Appeals), National Faceless Appeal Centre, Delhi confirmed the assessment
order. The appeal was dismissed for non-prosecution as the assessee did not
respond to notices issued during appellate proceedings.
Issues Involved
Whether exemption under Sections 11 and 12
could be denied to a trust holding valid registration under Section 12A without
granting an opportunity of hearing, whether non-furnishing of certain details
justified denial of exemption of the entire income, and whether the matter
required restoration for fresh adjudication.
Petitioner’s Arguments
The assessee submitted that it is a small
charitable trust located in a remote village with limited resources and that
the trustees were unaware of technical income-tax procedures. It was argued
that exemption was denied and confirmed without hearing the assessee at any
stage. The assessee contended that it held a valid registration under Section
12A and had applied the entire income for charitable purposes in accordance
with its objects. It was pleaded that the assessee was in a position to
substantiate its claim if an opportunity was granted.
Respondent’s Arguments
The Revenue fairly conceded that the
disallowance was made without hearing the assessee. However, it was argued that
the assessee failed to cooperate during both assessment and appellate
proceedings and therefore did not deserve a second opportunity.
Court Order / Findings
The ITAT Ahmedabad observed that the
assessment was framed and exemption under Sections 11 and 12 was denied without
hearing the assessee at all, a fact not disputed by the Revenue. The Tribunal
noted that the Assessing Officer himself recorded that the assessee held a
valid registration under Section 12A and was eligible to claim exemption to the
extent income was applied for charitable purposes.
The Tribunal held that denial of exemption
of the entire income merely due to non-furnishing of certain details, without
granting an opportunity of hearing, was not in accordance with law. At the same
time, the Tribunal took note of the casual approach of the assessee in not
responding during assessment and appellate proceedings.
Balancing the principles of natural justice
with procedural discipline, the Tribunal set aside the orders of the lower authorities
and restored the matter to the file of the Assessing Officer for fresh
adjudication after granting opportunity of hearing. A cost of ₹2,000 was
imposed on the assessee, payable to the Prime Minister’s National Relief Fund,
as a condition precedent for reconsideration.
Important Clarification
The Tribunal clarified that a charitable
trust holding valid registration under Section 12A cannot be denied exemption
under Sections 11 and 12 without proper examination of application of income
and without affording an opportunity of hearing. Procedural lapses by the
assessee may be addressed by imposing cost, but substantive rights cannot be
denied without due process.
Final Outcome
The appeal filed by the assessee was allowed
for statistical purposes. The assessment order denying exemption under
Sections 11 and 12 was set aside, and the matter was restored to the
file of the Assessing Officer for fresh adjudication, subject to payment of
cost of ₹2,000 by the assessee to the Prime Minister’s National Relief Fund.
Source
Link - https://www.mytaxexpert.co.in/uploads/1769061441_MANGALJIVANTRUSTPATANSEDRANAVS.ITOEXEMPPALANPURPALANPUR.pdf
This content is shared strictly for general information and knowledge purposes only. Readers should independently verify the information from reliable sources. It is not intended to provide legal, professional, or advisory guidance. The author and the organisation disclaim all liability arising from the use of this content. The material has been prepared with the assistance of AI tools.
0 Comments
Leave a Comment