Facts of the Case
The assessee, Ashalata Kulshrestha, filed
her return of income for Assessment Year 2016-17 on 19.07.2016 declaring total
income of ₹18,54,950, which was processed under Section 143(1). The case was
selected for limited scrutiny to verify correctness of deduction claimed from
capital gains.
The assessee had sold an immovable property
for ₹2,31,00,000 and claimed exemption under Section 54, resulting in nil
long-term capital gain. The assessment was completed under Section 143(3) on
14.12.2018 determining total income at ₹2,45,39,650 by treating the capital
gain as short-term. The assessee’s appeal on quantum was partly allowed by the
Tribunal vide order dated 28.06.2023.
Meanwhile, the Assessing Officer initiated
penalty proceedings under Section 271(1)(c) and issued a show cause notice
dated 29.04.2019. Thereafter, penalty of ₹78,97,358 was levied. The CIT(A)
partly confirmed the penalty. Aggrieved, the assessee filed an appeal before
the Tribunal with a delay of 12 days, which was condoned.
Issues Involved
Whether penalty under Section 271(1)(c) was
valid when the show cause notice and penalty order did not specify the exact
limb under which penalty was initiated, whether mere change in head of income
from long-term to short-term capital gain constitutes concealment or furnishing
of inaccurate particulars, and whether penalty could survive when the quantum
addition itself was partly deleted by the Tribunal.
Petitioner’s Arguments
The assessee contended that the penalty
proceedings were vitiated as the show cause notice did not specify whether
penalty was initiated for concealment of income or for furnishing inaccurate
particulars. It was further argued that the penalty order itself was vague and
inconsistent. The assessee also submitted that the capital gain was duly
disclosed in the return and only the head of income was disputed, which cannot
attract penalty. Reliance was placed on the fact that the Tribunal had partly
allowed the quantum appeal.
Respondent’s Arguments
The Revenue relied on the orders of the
Assessing Officer and the CIT(A) and argued that the assessee had claimed
incorrect exemption leading to furnishing of inaccurate particulars.
Court Order / Findings
The ITAT Ahmedabad observed that the show
cause notice issued under Section 271(1)(c) did not specify the exact charge
against the assessee. The Tribunal noted that even in the penalty order, the
Assessing Officer failed to clearly state whether the penalty was for
concealment of income or furnishing inaccurate particulars. Such ambiguity was
held to be fatal to penalty proceedings.
The Tribunal further observed that the
dispute pertained to classification of capital gains as long-term or short-term
and that the assessee had disclosed all relevant facts in the return of income.
Mere change in head of income, especially when the quantum addition was partly
deleted by the Tribunal, could not justify levy of penalty.
Accordingly, the Tribunal held that the
penalty under Section 271(1)(c) was unsustainable in law.
Important Clarification
The Tribunal clarified that penalty
proceedings require strict compliance with statutory requirements. Failure to
specify the exact limb of Section 271(1)(c) in the notice and penalty order
vitiates the proceedings. It was also clarified that mere reclassification of
income does not amount to concealment or furnishing inaccurate particulars.
Final Outcome
The appeal filed by the assessee was allowed.
The penalty of ₹78,97,358 levied under Section 271(1)(c) was deleted in full.
Source
Link - https://www.mytaxexpert.co.in/uploads/1769060652_ASHALATAKULSHRESTHAAHMEDABADVS.DCITCIRCLE311AHMEDABAD.pdf
Disclaimer
This content is shared strictly for general information and knowledge purposes only. Readers should independently verify the information from reliable sources. It is not intended to provide legal, professional, or advisory guidance. The author and the organisation disclaim all liability arising from the use of this content. The material has been prepared with the assistance of AI tools.
0 Comments
Leave a Comment