Facts of the
Case
The assessee, an individual carrying on business
through his proprietorship concern “M/s SHE”, filed his return of income for
Assessment Year 2019-20 claiming interest expenditure of ₹11,82,661 as business
deduction. Out of the said amount, the Assessing Officer disallowed interest of
₹6,71,628 on the ground that the borrowed funds were utilised for acquiring a
commercial property situated at Miraz Mall, Ajmer, which was not proved to have
been put to use for business purposes during the relevant year. The disallowance
was upheld by the CIT(A), NFAC. Aggrieved, the assessee filed an appeal before
the Tribunal.
Issues
Involved
Whether interest on borrowed capital utilised for
acquisition of a commercial property is allowable as business expenditure under
Section 36(1)(iii) when the asset is not put to use, whether such interest can
alternatively be allowed under Section 24(b) while computing income from house
property, and whether the matter requires restoration for computation of annual
value.
Petitioner’s
Arguments
The assessee contended that the interest
expenditure was incurred for acquisition of a commercial property intended for
business use and therefore allowable under Section 36(1)(iii). Alternatively,
it was argued that even if the property was not accepted as used for business,
the interest expenditure should be allowed as deduction under Section 24(b)
while computing income from house property. Reliance was placed on the
statutory scheme permitting deduction of interest on borrowed capital used for
acquiring property.
Respondent’s
Arguments
The Revenue contended that the assessee failed to
establish actual use of the commercial property for business purposes during
the relevant year and therefore interest could not be allowed under Section
36(1)(iii). It was further argued that since no income from the property was
shown and the assessee failed to demonstrate letting out or business use,
deduction under Section 24(b) was also not allowable.
Court Order
/ Findings
The ITAT Jaipur held that interest on borrowed
capital for acquisition of a capital asset is allowable under Section
36(1)(iii) only from the date the asset is put to use. The Tribunal noted that
the assessee failed to establish that the commercial property was put to use
for business during the relevant assessment year and therefore upheld the
disallowance of interest under Section 36(1)(iii).
However, the Tribunal accepted the alternate plea
of the assessee and held that since the property was not used for business, its
annual value was chargeable under the head “Income from House Property” in
terms of Section 22. The Tribunal held that interest paid on borrowed capital
for acquisition of such property is allowable as deduction under Section 24(b).
The matter was restored to the file of the Assessing Officer to compute the
annual value of the property and allow deduction of interest under Section
24(b) in accordance with law after granting due opportunity of hearing to the
assessee.
Important
Clarification
The Tribunal clarified that interest on borrowed
capital is allowable as business expenditure only after the asset is put to
use. Where the asset is not used for business, the property falls under the
head “Income from House Property” and interest deduction is allowable under
Section 24(b) while computing annual value, subject to statutory limits and
computation provisions.
Final
Outcome
The appeal filed by the assessee was partly allowed
for statistical purposes. The disallowance of interest under Section 36(1)(iii)
was upheld, but the Assessing Officer was directed to allow deduction of
interest under Section 24(b) after computing the annual value of the property
in accordance with law and after providing reasonable opportunity of being
heard to the assessee.
Link to download order- https://www.mytaxexpert.co.in/uploads/1768993107_RUPKUMARRAMCHANDANIAJMERVS.INCOMETAXOFFICERWD12AJMERAJMER.pdf
Disclaimer
This
content is shared strictly for general information and knowledge purposes only.
Readers should independently verify the information from reliable sources. It
is not intended to provide legal, professional, or advisory guidance. The
author and the organisation disclaim all liability arising from the use of this
content. The material has been prepared with the assistance of AI tools.
0 Comments
Leave a Comment