Facts of the
Case
The assessee, Amar Partap Steels Private Limited,
filed an appeal before the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal against the
revisionary order passed by the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax-2, Jaipur
under Section 263 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 for Assessment Year 2021-22. The
revision order dated 12.03.2025 had set aside the original assessment order
dated 27.12.2022 with a direction to verify share premium of ₹76,19,200
received during the year in light of Section 56(2)(viib) read with Rule 11UA.
Pursuant to the Section 263 order, the Assessing
Officer passed a fresh assessment order under Section 144 read with Sections
263 and 144B on 29.10.2025. After examining valuation reports and documentary
evidence, the Assessing Officer accepted the assessee’s submissions in entirety
and assessed the income at ₹2,33,40,480, being the returned income, with nil
variation.
In view of complete relief granted in the
consequential proceedings, the assessee filed a written application before the
Tribunal seeking permission to withdraw the appeal, stating that the appeal
against the Section 263 order had become infructuous. The Departmental
Representative raised no objection to the withdrawal.
Issues
Involved
Whether the appeal filed against the revisionary
order under Section 263 survived for adjudication when the assessee had already
received complete relief in consequential assessment proceedings and sought
withdrawal of the appeal.
Petitioner’s
Arguments
The assessee submitted that subsequent to the
Section 263 order, the Assessing Officer had completed the consequential
assessment after detailed verification and accepted the returned income without
any addition. Since the grievance against the revision order no longer
survived, the appeal before the Tribunal had become infructuous and deserved to
be dismissed as withdrawn.
Respondent’s
Arguments
The Revenue, through the Departmental
Representative, stated that it had no objection to the withdrawal of the appeal
by the assessee.
Court Order
/ Findings
The ITAT Jaipur noted that the assessee had filed a
written application seeking withdrawal of the appeal and that the Department
had no objection thereto. The Tribunal observed that in view of complete relief
granted to the assessee in the consequential assessment proceedings, the appeal
against the Section 263 order had become infructuous. Accordingly, the Tribunal
permitted withdrawal of the appeal and dismissed the same as withdrawn.
Important
Clarification
The Tribunal clarified that where an assessee
receives complete relief in consequential proceedings pursuant to a revision
order under Section 263, the appeal challenging such revision becomes
infructuous. In such circumstances, withdrawal of the appeal is permissible and
appropriate.
Final
Outcome
The appeal filed by the assessee was dismissed as
withdrawn. The challenge to the revisionary order passed under Section 263 was
rendered infructuous in view of complete relief granted in the consequential
assessment proceedings.
Source Link- https://itat.gov.in/public/files/upload/1766040541-8Un2fg-1-TO.pdf
Disclaimer
This
content is shared strictly for general information and knowledge purposes only.
Readers should independently verify the information from reliable sources. It
is not intended to provide legal, professional, or advisory guidance. The
author and the organisation disclaim all liability arising from the use of this
content. The material has been prepared with the assistance of AI tools.
0 Comments
Leave a Comment