Facts of the Case
A complaint was filed
by CA Sunil Kumar against CA Arpit Taneja alleging professional misconduct in
relation to acceptance of a tax audit assignment. The complainant was the tax
auditor of M/s Divyansh Associates, a proprietary concern, for the financial
year 2017-18. For the subsequent financial year 2018-19, the respondent
conducted the tax audit of the same concern.
It was alleged that
the respondent accepted the audit assignment without obtaining a No Objection
Certificate from the complainant and without communicating with the outgoing
auditor in writing, as mandated under the Chartered Accountants Act, 1949. The
matter was examined by the Director (Discipline) and thereafter placed before
the Board of Discipline.
Issues Involved
Whether the respondent
accepted the position of auditor previously held by another Chartered
Accountant without first communicating with the outgoing auditor in writing, in
violation of Item (8) of Part I of the First Schedule to the Chartered
Accountants Act, 1949, and whether such conduct amounted to professional
misconduct warranting action under Section 21A.
Petitioner’s
Arguments
The complainant
contended that the respondent performed the tax audit for financial year
2018-19 without any written communication or No Objection Certificate from the
outgoing auditor. It was submitted that the statutory requirement under Item
(8) of Part I of the First Schedule was mandatory and its violation constituted
professional misconduct.
Respondent’s
Arguments
The respondent
submitted that verbal communications had taken place and that the complainant
had orally requested him to undertake the audit due to the complainant’s health
issues. It was argued that there were cordial relations between the parties and
that the audit was accepted in good faith. The respondent, however, did not
produce any documentary evidence to establish written communication with the
outgoing auditor.
Court / Authority
Order and Findings
The Board of
Discipline examined the documents and submissions on record and noted that Item
(8) of Part I of the First Schedule to the Chartered Accountants Act, 1949
clearly mandates written communication with the outgoing auditor before
acceptance of an audit assignment. The Board observed that the respondent
admitted having accepted the audit without following the prescribed statutory
procedure and failed to produce any evidence of written communication or No
Objection Certificate.
The Board held that
verbal communication or personal relationship cannot substitute the mandatory
statutory requirement. Accordingly, the Board concluded that the respondent had
violated Item (8) of Part I of the First Schedule and was guilty of
professional misconduct within the meaning of the Chartered Accountants Act,
1949.
Important
Clarification
The Board clarified
that it is the statutory duty of an incoming auditor to communicate in writing
with the outgoing auditor before accepting an audit assignment. Non-compliance
with this requirement, irrespective of personal relations or alleged oral
consent, constitutes professional misconduct under the Act.
Final Outcome
The ICAI Board of
Discipline held CA Arpit Taneja (M. No. 544209) guilty of Professional Misconduct
falling within the meaning of Item (8) of Part I of the First Schedule
to the Chartered Accountants Act, 1949. In exercise of powers under Section
21A(3) of the Act, by order dated 29 July 2025, the Board imposed
a monetary penalty of ₹25,000 (Rupees Twenty-Five Thousand only) on the
Respondent.
Source Link- https://www.mytaxexpert.co.in/uploads/1768892450_CA.SunilKumarM.No.075294vsCA.ArpitTanejaM.No.544209Bharatpur.pdf
Disclaimer
This content is shared strictly for general
information and knowledge purposes only. Readers should independently verify
the information from reliable sources. It is not intended to provide legal,
professional, or advisory guidance. The author and the organisation disclaim
all liability arising from the use of this content. The material has been
prepared with the assistance of AI tools.
0 Comments
Leave a Comment