Facts of the Case
The Revenue filed writ petitions challenging the common order
dated 9 May 2016 passed by the Authority for Advance Ruling (Income Tax),
whereby the applications filed by LS Cable & Systems Ltd Korea were decided
in its favour.
The AAR held that income arising from overseas/offshore supply
under the contract in question would not be taxable in India. The AAR relied
upon its earlier ruling dated 26 July 2011, which had already been affirmed by
the Delhi High Court.
The respondent-company, a Korean tax resident, was engaged in
offshore supply of equipment and materials for the Hyderabad Project under a
contractual arrangement involving supply of 220, 132 kV XLPE insulated UG cable
and accessories. The primary issue concerned whether consideration received for
offshore supply could be brought to tax in India.
Issues Involved
- Whether
the consideration received by a non-resident from offshore supply of
equipment and materials is taxable in India?
- Whether
income from offshore supplies accrues or arises in India under Section
9(1)(i) of the Income-tax Act, 1961?
- Whether
such income is taxable under the India-Korea DTAA?
- Whether
the composite nature of the contract changes the taxability position of
offshore supplies?
Petitioner’s Arguments (Revenue)
The Revenue argued that the present case was distinguishable
from earlier judgments because those cases involved three separate contracts,
namely:
- Offshore
supply contract
- Onshore
supply contract
- Onshore
service contract
Whereas in the present matter, the contract was composite in
nature and contemplated both offshore and onshore supply, thereby creating a
sufficient territorial nexus with India for taxation purposes.
Respondent’s Arguments (Assessee)
The respondent contended that the issue placed before the AAR
was restricted exclusively to offshore supplies and not the composite contract
as a whole.
It was submitted that title to goods passed outside India,
payments were received outside India, and the offshore supply segment was
independent for tax purposes. Therefore, no income accrued or arose in India in
respect of offshore supplies.
Court Findings / Court Order
The Delhi High Court upheld the AAR ruling and dismissed the
writ petitions filed by the Revenue.
The Court observed:
- The
issue before the AAR was specifically confined to offshore supplies.
- The
taxability question in the present case was substantially identical to
earlier cases already decided.
- The
mere fact that the overall contract was composite would not alter the
legal position insofar as offshore supply was concerned.
- Earlier
AAR decisions had already been affirmed by the High Court.
The Court found no legal infirmity in the AAR’s reasoning and
upheld the non-taxability of offshore supply receipts in India.
Important Clarification
The Court clarified that even in a composite contract
involving offshore and onshore obligations, the offshore supply component can
still retain independent tax treatment if the issue before the adjudicating
authority is specifically confined to offshore supplies.
This decision reinforces the settled principle that offshore
supply income of a non-resident is not taxable in India where property in goods
passes outside India and the transaction is completed outside Indian territory.
Sections Involved
- Section
9(1)(i), Income-tax Act, 1961 – Income deemed to accrue
or arise in India
- Section
245R, Income-tax Act, 1961 – Advance Ruling mechanism
- India-Korea
Double Taxation Avoidance Agreement (DTAA)
Link to download the order -
https://delhihighcourt.nic.in/app/case_number_pdf/2017:DHC:8243-DB/SMD26072017CW62962017_130215.pdf
Disclaimer
This content is shared strictly for general information and knowledge purposes only. Readers should independently verify the information from reliable sources. It is not intended to provide legal, professional, or advisory guidance. The author and the organisation disclaim all liability arising from the use of this content. The material has been prepared with the assistance of AI tools.
0 Comments
Leave a Comment