The Chennai Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal
examined whether penalty imposed under Section 271B of the Income Tax Act, 1961
for failure to furnish the tax audit report within the prescribed time was
sustainable, in a case where the assessee pleaded existence of reasonable cause
under Section 273B of the Act.
The assessee, a partnership firm engaged in the business of
textile dyeing and processing, was required to furnish its audit report for the
Assessment Year 2018-19 as its turnover exceeded the prescribed threshold. The
Assessing Officer imposed a penalty of ₹1,50,000 under Section 271B on the
ground that the audit report was not filed within the statutory time limit. The
penalty was confirmed by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), National
Faceless Appeal Centre.
Before the Tribunal, the assessee submitted that its
business operations were severely disrupted due to liquidation proceedings
initiated under the National Company Law Tribunal. It was further contended
that the partner who was primarily responsible for maintaining the accounts had
expired after prolonged illness. Supporting documents, including NCLT records,
death certificate of the partner, and GST returns reflecting slowdown of
business, were placed on record. It was argued that these circumstances constituted
reasonable cause within the meaning of Section 273B, warranting deletion of the
penalty.
The Tribunal observed that the initiation of liquidation
proceedings and the demise of the partner handling the accounts were undisputed
facts supported by documentary evidence. Taking into account the totality of
circumstances, the Tribunal held that the assessee had established reasonable
cause for the delay in furnishing the audit report. The Tribunal further noted
that the audit report had been filed well before completion of the assessment
and that the Assessing Officer had the benefit of the audit report while
framing the assessment order.
The Tribunal held that the lapse on the part of the assessee
constituted only a venial breach which did not result in any loss to the
Revenue. In view of the reasonable cause demonstrated by the assessee and the
absence of any prejudice to the exchequer, the Tribunal concluded that the
penalty under Section 271B was not justified.
Accordingly, the Tribunal deleted the penalty imposed under
Section 271B and allowed the appeal filed by the assessee.
Source Link - https://itat.gov.in/public/files/upload/1768210262-WZKe5Z-1-TO.pdf
Disclaimer
This content is shared strictly for general information and knowledge purposes only. Readers should independently verify the information from reliable sources. It is not intended to provide legal, professional, or advisory guidance. The author and the organisation disclaim all liability arising from the use of this content. The material has been prepared with the assistance of AI tools.
0 Comments
Leave a Comment