Facts of the
Case
The present batch of writ petitions concerned
reassessment proceedings initiated under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act,
1961 for Assessment Years 2016–17 and 2017–18.
The petitioners (assessees) challenged the validity
of reassessment notices issued after 01.04.2021 under the amended regime
introduced by the Finance Act, 2021.
The core factual background included:
- Notices were initially issued under the unamended Section 148
between 01.04.2021 and 30.06.2021.
- These notices were later treated as notices under Section
148A(b) in light of the Supreme Court judgment in Union of India v.
Ashish Agarwal.
- Subsequently, orders under Section 148A(d) and fresh notices
under Section 148 were issued.
- In all cases, the alleged escaped income was below ₹50 lakhs.
The petitioners contended that such reassessment proceedings were time-barred under Section 149(1)(a).
Issues
Involved
- Whether reassessment notices issued under Section 148 after
01.04.2021 are barred by limitation under Section 149(1)(a) where
escaped income is below ₹50 lakhs.
- Whether the Revenue can invoke the extended limitation period under
Section 149(1)(b) without satisfying statutory conditions.
- Whether the “travel back in time” theory based on CBDT
Instruction dated 11.05.2022 is legally sustainable.
- Whether TOLA and the Supreme Court judgment in Union of India v. Ashish Agarwal extend limitation beyond what is prescribed under amended law.
Petitioner’s
Arguments
- The limitation under Section 149(1)(a) is 3 years,
which had already expired (31.03.2020 / 31.03.2021).
- Since escaped income was less than ₹50 lakhs, the extended
10-year period under Section 149(1)(b) was not applicable.
- The Finance Act, 2021 substituted Sections 147–151, thereby
replacing the old regime entirely.
- The “travel back in time” theory has no statutory backing
and is not supported by:
- The Income Tax Act
- TOLA
- Supreme Court judgment in Union of India v. Ashish Agarwal
- CBDT Instruction dated 11.05.2022 is ultra vires as it
overrides statutory provisions.
- Notices issued after 01.04.2021 must strictly comply with the new regime and limitation provisions.
Respondent’s
Arguments
- Notices issued between 01.04.2021 and 30.06.2021 were saved by the
Supreme Court in Union of India v. Ashish Agarwal.
- Under TOLA, limitation stood extended up to 30.06.2021.
- Such notices should be treated as valid under Section 148A(b).
- The limitation should be computed by excluding the period between
notice issuance and reply filing.
- CBDT Instruction dated 11.05.2022 is valid and clarifies implementation of the Supreme Court judgment.
Court
Findings / Order
- Section 149(1)(a) applies where
escaped income is below ₹50 lakhs.
- The extended limitation under Section 149(1)(b) cannot be
invoked unless statutory conditions are satisfied.
- The “travel back in time” theory is legally unsustainable.
- The Supreme Court in Union of India v. Ashish Agarwal only
validated procedural conversion of notices, not extension of limitation.
- TOLA does not override or extend limitation under the amended
Section 149 beyond its clear terms.
- CBDT Instruction dated 11.05.2022 cannot override statutory
provisions.
Final
Holding
- Reassessment notices issued beyond the limitation period under Section 149(1)(a) are invalid and liable to be quashed.
Important
Clarifications by Court
- Substitution of law by Finance Act, 2021 means old provisions
cease to exist.
- Limitation must be strictly interpreted in taxation statutes.
- Executive instructions (CBDT) cannot override statutory law.
- Supreme Court directions under Article 142 do not create new
limitation periods.
- TOLA only provided temporary relaxation, not permanent
alteration of limitation.
Sections
Involved
- Section 147 – Income escaping assessment
- Section 148 – Issue of notice
- Section 148A – Procedure for reassessment
- Section 149(1)(a) & (b) – Time limits
- Section 151 – Sanction for notice
- Section 119 – CBDT powers
- Taxation and Other Laws (Relaxation and Amendment of Certain Provisions) Act, 2020 (TOLA)
Link to download the
order -https://delhihighcourt.nic.in/app/showFileJudgment/RAS10112023CW115272022_212005.pdf
Disclaimer
This content is shared strictly for general information and
knowledge purposes only. Readers should independently verify the information
from reliable sources. It is not intended to provide legal, professional, or
advisory guidance. The author and the organisation disclaim all liability arising
from the use of this content. The material has been prepared with the
assistance of AI tools.
0 Comments
Leave a Comment