In
Passion Realtech Private Limited v. Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax,
Central Circle-2, Faridabad, the Delhi Bench of the Income Tax Appellate
Tribunal examined the validity of an addition of ₹4.87 crore made under Section
68 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 on account of unsecured loan received from M/s
Height Propcon Pvt. Ltd. for Assessment Year 2017–18.
The
Assessing Officer treated the loan as unexplained cash credit on the basis of
statements recorded during search and survey proceedings in the case of third
parties and alleged that the lender was a dummy accommodation entry provider.
The CIT(A) upheld the addition. Before the Tribunal, the assessee demonstrated
that it had furnished complete documentary evidence including confirmation of
accounts, income-tax returns, bank statements, and audited financial statements
of the lender. It was also shown that the assessee had substantial opening
balance of loans from the same lender and that the entire loan was repaid in
subsequent years without any adverse inference by the Revenue.
The
Tribunal noted that in the case of the lender company itself, assessment for
the same Assessment Year 2017–18 had been completed under Section 143(3) and
the Revenue had accepted its identity and capacity to advance loans. In such
circumstances, the Tribunal held that the Assessing Officer could not take a
contradictory stand by doubting the lender’s creditworthiness in the hands of
the borrower. The Tribunal further observed that repayment of loan is a
significant factor establishing the genuineness of the transaction and
distinguishes the case from those involving mere paper entries.
Relying
on its own earlier decisions and coordinate bench rulings including Dazzling
Constructions Pvt. Ltd. v. ITO, the Tribunal held that the assessee had
successfully discharged the onus cast upon it under Section 68. Accordingly,
the addition of ₹4.87 crore was deleted.
The Tribunal also upheld the Assessing Officer’s jurisdiction to examine loans
within the scope of limited scrutiny, but granted full relief on merits.
Source Link- https://itat.gov.in/public/files/upload/1767788352-qeftCh-1-TO.pdf
Disclaimer
This content is shared strictly
for general information and knowledge purposes only. Readers should
independently verify the information from reliable sources. It is not intended
to provide legal, professional, or advisory guidance. The author and the
organisation disclaim all liability arising from the use of this content. The
material has been prepared with the assistance of AI tools.
0 Comments
Leave a Comment