Facts of the Case
Multiple writ petitions were filed before the Delhi
High Court challenging reassessment proceedings initiated by the Income Tax
Department for Assessment Years 2016-17
and 2017-18.
The petitioners had originally filed their returns
of income which were processed by the department under Section 143(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. Subsequently, notices
were issued by the revenue under Section
148A(b) alleging that certain income had escaped assessment.
After considering the responses of the assessees,
the department passed orders under Section
148A(d) and issued consequential notices under Section 148 for reassessment. The petitioners challenged these
proceedings on the ground that the mandatory approval from the “specified authority” required under
the Income Tax Act was not properly obtained before issuing the reassessment
notices.
Since identical issues were involved, several writ
petitions were heard together by the High Court.
Issues Involved
- Whether reassessment notices issued under
Section 148 read with Section 148A are valid without approval of the
“specified authority”.
- Whether the Income Tax Department could
rely upon TOLA, 2020 and CBDT Instruction No. 1/2022 to justify
reassessment proceedings.
- Whether prior approval under Section 151
of the Income Tax Act is mandatory for initiating reassessment
proceedings.
Petitioner’s Arguments
- The petitioners contended that reassessment proceedings were invalid because they were initiated
without approval of the “specified authority” as required under Section
151(ii) of the Income Tax Act.
- It was argued that approval obtained from an authority not designated under the statute
would render the proceedings void.
- The petitioners also submitted that statutory safeguards introduced
after the Finance Act, 2021,
especially under Sections 148A and
151, must be strictly complied with before issuing reassessment
notices.
- The reassessment proceedings therefore suffered from lack of jurisdiction.
Respondent’s Arguments
- The Income Tax Department relied upon the Taxation and Other Laws (Relaxation and Amendment of Certain
Provisions) Act, 2020 (TOLA) and CBDT Instruction No. 1/2022 dated 11.05.2022 to justify the
reassessment notices.
- The revenue contended that the approvals obtained were sufficient
and that the procedural requirement should not invalidate the reassessment
proceedings.
- It was also argued that approval of the specified authority was not mandatory in the manner suggested by
the petitioners.
Court’s Findings
The Delhi High Court examined the statutory
framework governing reassessment proceedings under the Income Tax Act and
emphasized that prior approval of the
“specified authority” is a mandatory requirement before issuing notices
under Section 148.
The Court observed that the statutory provisions
clearly require that the Assessing Officer must obtain prior sanction from the designated authority before initiating
reassessment proceedings.
The argument raised by the revenue that such
approval was not mandatory was rejected by the Court. The Court held that such
a contention was contrary to the
express provisions of the Income Tax Act.
The Court also compared the provisions of Sections 148, 149 and 151 before and after
the Finance Act, 2021, noting that the amended framework strengthened
procedural safeguards for taxpayers.
Court Order
The Delhi High Court ruled in favour of the assessees, holding that reassessment notices
issued without proper approval of the specified authority are unsustainable in law.
Consequently, the impugned reassessment notices and
proceedings were liable to be set aside
where statutory requirements were not complied with.
Important Clarification by the Court
- Approval of the specified authority is a
mandatory jurisdictional requirement before
issuing a notice under Section 148.
- Any reassessment initiated without such approval violates the statutory mandate and
cannot be sustained.
- Administrative instructions or relaxations cannot override the express provisions of the Income Tax Act.
Link to download the order - https://delhihighcourt.nic.in/app/showFileJudgment/RAS05012024CW165242022_114311.pdf
Disclaimer
This content is shared
strictly for general information and knowledge purposes only. Readers should
independently verify the information from reliable sources. It is not intended
to provide legal, professional, or advisory guidance. The author and the organisation
disclaim all liability arising from the use of this content. The material has
been prepared with the assistance of AI tools.
0 Comments
Leave a Comment