Facts of the Case

The petitioners, including Twylight Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd. and several other assessees, filed writ petitions before the Delhi High Court challenging the reassessment proceedings initiated by the Income Tax Department. The proceedings were initiated through notices issued under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, following orders passed under Section 148A(d).

The petitioners contended that the reassessment proceedings were initiated without proper compliance with the statutory procedure prescribed under the amended reassessment regime introduced by the Finance Act, 2021, particularly regarding consideration of their replies and the information relied upon by the Assessing Officer.

The petitioners sought quashing of the reassessment notices as well as the orders passed under Section 148A(d), arguing that the reassessment proceedings were arbitrary and contrary to the law governing reassessment.

 

Issues Involved

  1. Whether the reassessment proceedings initiated under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 pursuant to an order passed under Section 148A(d) were valid in law.
  2. Whether the Assessing Officer had complied with the mandatory procedure prescribed under Section 148A, including consideration of the assessee’s response.
  3. Whether the writ jurisdiction of the High Court could be invoked at the stage of initiation of reassessment proceedings.

 

Petitioner’s Arguments

  • The petitioners argued that the orders passed under Section 148A(d) were arbitrary and lacked proper reasoning.
  • It was contended that the Assessing Officer had not adequately considered the replies submitted by the assessees in response to the show cause notices issued under Section 148A(b).
  • The petitioners further submitted that the reassessment proceedings were initiated without proper application of mind and therefore violated the procedural safeguards introduced by the amended reassessment provisions.

 

Respondent’s Arguments

  • The Income Tax Department contended that the reassessment proceedings were initiated strictly in accordance with the provisions of the Income Tax Act, 1961.
  • It was argued that the orders under Section 148A(d) were passed after considering the material available on record and the responses submitted by the petitioners.
  • The respondents also submitted that the petitioners had adequate statutory remedies available under the Act, and therefore the writ petitions were not maintainable at this preliminary stage.

Court Findings

The Delhi High Court examined the reassessment framework under the amended provisions of the Income Tax Act and observed that the statutory procedure under Section 148A provides safeguards to the assessee before the issuance of a notice under Section 148.

The Court noted that the Assessing Officer is required to consider the material available and the response of the assessee before forming an opinion regarding the initiation of reassessment proceedings.

After examining the records, the Court held that the reassessment proceedings were initiated in accordance with the statutory framework and that no ground was made out for interference under Article 226 of the Constitution of India.

 

Court Order

The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petitions and upheld the validity of the orders passed under Section 148A(d) and the consequent notices issued under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961.

The Court held that the reassessment proceedings could continue in accordance with law and that the petitioners could raise their contentions before the appropriate authority during the assessment proceedings. 

Important Clarification

  • The reassessment regime under Sections 147, 148, and 148A provides a structured mechanism for reopening assessments.
  • Judicial interference under Article 226 is limited when reassessment proceedings are initiated following the statutory procedure.
  • Assessees retain the right to contest the merits of reassessment during the subsequent stages of the proceedings under the Income Tax Act.

Link to download the order - https://delhihighcourt.nic.in/app/showFileJudgment/RAS05012024CW165242022_114311.pdf

Disclaimer

This content is shared strictly for general information and knowledge purposes only. Readers should independently verify the information from reliable sources. It is not intended to provide legal, professional, or advisory guidance. The author and the organisation disclaim all liability arising from the use of this content. The material has been prepared with the assistance of AI tools.