Facts of the Case

A batch of writ petitions challenged notices issued under Section 153C of the Income Tax Act, 1961 to assessees who were not subjected to the original search. The petitioners contended that no incriminating material relating to the specific assessment years proposed to be reopened had been found during the search of another person. In several cases, the satisfaction notes either did not refer to the relevant assessment years or were not furnished to the petitioners. Despite this, reassessment proceedings were initiated for multiple years within the statutory block period.

Issues Involved

  1. Whether jurisdiction under Section 153C can be validly assumed against a non-searched person without incriminating material relating to the specific assessment year.
  2. Whether material pertaining to one year can justify reopening of all six preceding assessment years.
  3. Whether failure to record or supply a proper satisfaction note vitiates the proceedings.
  4. Whether completed assessments can be reopened without material having a bearing on determination of income for that year.

Petitioner’s Arguments

The petitioners argued that initiation of proceedings under Section 153C was without jurisdiction since no seized material pertaining to the relevant assessment years existed. They contended that material relating to a particular year cannot justify reassessment of other years. For completed assessments, reassessment is permissible only where seized material specifically relates to that year and impacts determination of total income. In some cases, satisfaction notes were either absent or did not establish any nexus between the seized material and the assessment years concerned.

Respondent’s Arguments

The Revenue submitted that once incriminating material is found during a search and is considered relevant to a non-searched person, proceedings under Section 153C may be initiated for the prescribed block period. It was argued that the statutory scheme allows assessment of multiple years and that the satisfaction recorded by the Assessing Officer was adequate to confer jurisdiction.

Court Order / FINDINGS

The Delhi High Court held that jurisdiction under Section 153C depends upon the existence of incriminating material belonging to or relating to the non-searched person and specifically connected to the assessment year sought to be reopened. Reassessment of completed assessments cannot be sustained unless the material discovered during the search has a direct bearing on the determination of total income for that particular year. The Court emphasized that discovery of material relating to one year does not authorize reopening of other years within the block period. Consequently, proceedings initiated without year-specific incriminating material were held to be legally unsustainable.

Important Clarification

The Court clarified that the existence of incriminating material is a jurisdictional precondition for invoking Section 153C against a non-searched person. The Assessing Officer must demonstrate a clear nexus between the seized material and the relevant assessment year. In the absence of such material, reassessment proceedings for completed years cannot be lawfully initiated merely because a search was conducted in the case of another person.

Link to download the order – https://www.mytaxexpert.co.in/uploads/1772191193_ASHUTOSHAGARWALVsASSISTANTCOMMISSIONEROFINCOMETAX..RESPONDENT1CENTRALCIRCLE28DELHIANDORS..pdf  

Disclaimer

This content is shared strictly for general information and knowledge purposes only. Readers should independently verify the information from reliable sources. It is not intended to provide legal, professional, or advisory guidance. The author and the organisation disclaim all liability arising from the use of this content. The material has been prepared with the assistance of AI tools.