Facts of the Case
The assessee, Mr. Dinesh Kumar Pahuja, had filed an
appeal before the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT), Allahabad Bench,
challenging the order passed by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) under
the Income-tax Act, 1961 for the relevant assessment year.
While the appeal was pending adjudication, the
assessee opted to resolve the dispute under the Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas
Scheme, 2020 (VSVS) introduced for settlement of pending tax disputes. The
declaration filed under the scheme was accepted by the designated authority,
which issued Form No. 3 determining the amount payable for settlement.
Subsequently, the assessee requested that the
appeal pending before the Tribunal be treated as withdrawn.
Issues Involved
Whether the Tribunal should proceed to decide the
appeal on merits or dismiss it as withdrawn when the assessee has opted for
settlement under the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme, 2020 and the declaration has been
accepted.
Petitioner’s (Assessee’s) Arguments
- The assessee had filed a declaration under the Vivad Se Vishwas
Scheme, 2020 to settle the pending dispute.
- The declaration had been accepted by the tax authorities.
- Form No. 3 had been issued by the designated authority specifying
the payable amount.
- In view of the settlement, the assessee did not intend to pursue
the appeal and sought permission to withdraw the same.
Relevant documentary evidence confirming acceptance
under the scheme was also placed on record.
Respondent’s (Department’s) Arguments
The Departmental Representative did not raise any
objection to the withdrawal of the appeal, acknowledging that the dispute had
been settled under the statutory scheme.
Court Order / Findings
- The assessee had opted for settlement under the Vivad Se Vishwas
Scheme, 2020.
- The designated authority had issued Form No. 3 confirming
acceptance of the declaration.
- Since the dispute stood resolved under the scheme, continuation of
the appellate proceedings would serve no useful purpose.
Important Clarification
The dismissal of the appeal was purely procedural
following settlement under a statutory dispute resolution scheme and does not
constitute adjudication on the merits of the issues involved.
Link to
download the order –
https://itat.gov.in/public/files/upload/1614249238-51%20Dinesh%20Kumar%20Pahuja.pdf
Disclaimer
This content is shared strictly for general information and
knowledge purposes only. Readers should independently verify the information
from reliable sources. It is not intended to provide legal, professional, or
advisory guidance. The author and the organisation disclaim all liability
arising from the use of this content. The material has been prepared with the
assistance of AI tools.
0 Comments
Leave a Comment