Facts of the
Case
The assessee’s reassessment for Assessment Year
2010-11 was completed by the Assessing Officer under Sections 147 read with
143(3), wherein certain receipts were treated as business turnover and profit
was estimated accordingly.
Subsequently, the Principal Commissioner of Income
Tax (PCIT) initiated revision proceedings under Section 263 on the ground that
the Assessing Officer had failed to conduct proper inquiry and that the
assessment order was erroneous and prejudicial to the interests of the Revenue.
A show-cause notice dated 18.03.2021 was issued to the assessee fixing hearing shortly thereafter. The revisionary order was passed on 23.03.2021 — within five days of issuance of the notice.
Issues
Involved
- Whether the PCIT validly exercised revisionary jurisdiction under
Section 263.
- Whether passing the revision order within five days of issuing the
show-cause notice constituted denial of reasonable opportunity of being
heard.
- Whether the assessment order was truly erroneous and prejudicial to
the interests of Revenue.
Petitioner’s (Assessee’s) Arguments
- The revision proceedings were conducted in violation of principles
of natural justice.
- Adequate and effective opportunity to respond was not provided.
- The Assessing Officer had already examined the relevant facts
during reassessment.
- The order under Section 263 was passed in undue haste merely to meet limitation.
Respondent’s (Revenue’s) Arguments
- The Assessing Officer had failed to properly examine discrepancies
between declared turnover and bank receipts.
- The assessment order suffered from lack of inquiry, making it
erroneous and prejudicial to Revenue.
- Therefore, invocation of Section 263 was justified.
Court Order
/ Findings (ITAT)
- The revisionary order was passed within five days of issuing the
show-cause notice.
- Such a short period did not provide proper and effective
opportunity of hearing.
- Principles of natural justice require meaningful opportunity to present a case.
Important
Clarification by the Tribunal
- Passing an order within an unreasonably short time after issuing
notice defeats the purpose of hearing.
- Revision under Section 263 must comply with principles of natural justice.
Link to
download the order
Disclaimer
This content is shared strictly for general information and
knowledge purposes only. Readers should independently verify the information
from reliable sources. It is not intended to provide legal, professional, or
advisory guidance. The author and the organisation disclaim all liability
arising from the use of this content. The material has been prepared with the
assistance of AI tools.
0 Comments
Leave a Comment