Facts of the Case
The assessee filed an appeal against the order
passed by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), National Faceless Appeal
Centre, for Assessment Year 2017-18. However, the appeal suffered from a
procedural defect, namely payment of a deficient appeal fee — ₹500 instead of
the prescribed ₹10,000.
Defect notices were issued by the Tribunal to
rectify the deficiency, but the defect was not removed within the stipulated
time, leading to dismissal of the appeal on technical grounds. The assessee
subsequently sought condonation of delay and restoration of the appeal,
explaining that the defect arose due to a bona fide mistake and not due to
deliberate negligence.
Issues
Involved
- Whether delay caused by non-payment of the correct appeal fee can
be condoned when the defect is bona fide.
- Whether an appeal should be dismissed on technical grounds despite
the existence of a substantial issue on merits.
- Whether principles of natural justice require restoration of the
appeal for adjudication on merits.
Petitioner’s
Arguments (Assessee)
- The deficiency in appeal fee occurred due to an inadvertent and
bona fide error.
- There was no intention to delay proceedings or disregard statutory
requirements.
- The assessee expressed willingness to rectify the defect and pay
the correct fee.
- Substantial justice should prevail over technical lapses,
especially when rights of appeal are involved.
Respondent’s
Arguments (Revenue)
- The appeal was defective due to non-compliance with statutory
requirements regarding appeal fee.
- Procedural rules must be adhered to for maintaining discipline in
appellate proceedings.
- Failure to rectify the defect within the prescribed time justified
dismissal of the appeal.
- The defect related to deficient appeal fee was procedural in
nature.
- The explanation offered by the assessee indicated a bona fide
mistake.
- Dismissing the appeal on technical grounds would result in denial
of substantive justice.
- Courts and tribunals should adopt a liberal approach where delay or
defect is neither intentional nor mala fide.
Accordingly, the Tribunal:
- Condoned the delay,
- Allowed rectification of the defect, and
- Restored the appeal for adjudication on merits.
The decision emphasized that procedural
requirements should facilitate justice, not obstruct it.
Important
Clarification
The Tribunal clarified that:
- Technical defects such as short payment of appeal fee should not
automatically result in dismissal when the appellant demonstrates bona
fide conduct.
- The right of appeal is a substantive statutory right and should not
be defeated by curable procedural lapses.
- Authorities must balance procedural compliance with principles of
natural justice.
Link to
download the order -https://itat.gov.in/public/files/upload/1677223105-NEWW%20ita%20NO.%2035%20aLLD%202022.pdf
Disclaimer
This content is shared strictly for general information and knowledge purposes only. Readers should independently verify the information from reliable sources. It is not intended to provide legal, professional, or advisory guidance. The author and the organisation disclaim all liability arising from the use of this content. The material has been prepared with the assistance of AI tools.
0 Comments
Leave a Comment