Facts of the Case
The Revenue filed an appeal under Section 260A of the
Income-tax Act, 1961 challenging the order dated 09.01.2019 passed by the
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal for Assessment Year 2009–10. The respondent,
Punjab National Bank, had filed its return declaring income of
₹47,05,64,49,815/-, which was assessed under Section 143(3) at
₹49,51,49,52,704/-.
The Assessing Officer made several additions including
disallowance under Section 14A read with Rule 8D amounting to ₹133.16 crore,
disallowance of loss on revaluation and shifting of securities, disallowance of
pension fund contribution, denial of amortisation of premium on HTM securities,
and disallowance of depreciation on goodwill. The CIT(A) granted relief on all
issues except minor disallowance of penal expenses. The ITAT dismissed the
Revenue’s appeal.
Issues Involved
Whether disallowance under Section 14A was sustainable where
shares were held as stock-in-trade, whether amortisation of premium on HTM
securities and loss on shifting of securities was allowable, whether
contribution to Employees’ Pension Fund was deductible, and whether
depreciation on goodwill arising from amalgamation was permissible.
Petitioner’s Arguments (Revenue)
The Revenue contended that Section 14A disallowance was
mandatory since exempt dividend income had been earned, that losses on
revaluation and shifting of securities were notional, that pension fund
contributions exceeded permissible limits, and that depreciation on goodwill
was not allowable.
Respondent’s Arguments (Assessee)
The assessee argued that shares were held as stock-in-trade
and dividend income was incidental, rendering Section 14A inapplicable. It was
submitted that amortisation of premium on HTM securities and loss on shifting
of securities was consistently allowed in earlier years, pension fund
contributions were statutory and business-related, and depreciation on goodwill
was covered by settled law.
Court Order / Findings
The Delhi High Court held that the issue of Section 14A stood
conclusively settled by the Supreme Court in Maxopp Investment Ltd. and South
Indian Bank Ltd., holding that no disallowance is warranted where shares
are held as stock-in-trade and dividend income is incidental.
The Court upheld amortisation of premium on HTM securities,
holding that premium paid over face value must be spread over the holding
period. The Court also upheld allowance of loss on shifting of securities
between AFS/HFT and HTM categories, relying on earlier binding precedents.
On pension fund contributions, the Court held that the amounts
were actually paid, wholly related to business, and allowable under the Act.
The claim of depreciation on goodwill arising from amalgamation was also
upheld, being a recurring issue settled in favour of the assessee by earlier
decisions including Smifs Securities Ltd.
Important Clarification
The Court clarified that banking companies holding securities
as stock-in-trade stand on a distinct footing for Section 14A, and accounting
treatment mandated by RBI guidelines for HTM securities and pension obligations
cannot be disregarded for tax purposes where consistent and lawful.
Final Outcome
The appeal filed by the Revenue was dismissed. The Delhi High
Court held that no substantial question of law arose from the ITAT’s order and
upheld all reliefs granted in favour of Punjab National Bank for Assessment
Year 2009–10.
Link to download the order - https://www.mytaxexpert.co.in/uploads/1769841166_PR.COMMISSIONEROFINCOMETAX7DELHIVsPUNJABNATIONALBANK.pdf
Disclaimer
This content is shared strictly for general information and
knowledge purposes only. Readers should independently verify the information
from reliable sources. It is not intended to provide legal, professional, or
advisory guidance. The author and the organisation disclaim all liability
arising from the use of this content. The material has been prepared with the
assistance of AI tools.
0 Comments
Leave a Comment