Facts of the Case
The Commissioner of Central GST and Central Excise, J&K
Jammu, filed CEA No. 262/2022 before the High Court of Jammu & Kashmir and
Ladakh at Jammu against M/s Cadila Pharmaceuticals Ltd., IGC Samba, Jammu.
The High Court noted that the present appeal was similar and
identical to several other Excise Appeals that had already been considered and
decided by the Court through its judgment and order dated 23 May 2022, in which
CEA No. 10/2020 was treated as the leading case.
After hearing counsel appearing for both parties, the Court
examined whether any new ground was available to the appellant that could
justify a different consideration of the present appeal.
Issues Involved
- Whether
CEA No. 262/2022 raised any new ground requiring independent adjudication
by the High Court.
- Whether
the present Excise Appeal was similar and identical to the earlier Excise
Appeals already decided by the judgment and order dated 23 May 2022.
- Whether
the matter stood squarely covered by the earlier decision rendered in CEA
No. 10/2020, being the leading case, along with connected appeals.
- Whether
the present appeal was liable to be dismissed on the same terms and
conditions as laid down in the earlier judgment dated 23 May 2022.
Petitioner’s / Appellant’s Arguments
The appellant, Commissioner of Central GST and Central Excise,
J&K Jammu, was represented before the High Court by counsel.
However, the brief order does not separately record or
reproduce the detailed factual or legal submissions advanced on behalf of the
appellant. The Court specifically concluded that no new ground was available to
the appellant and that the matter stood squarely covered by the earlier
decision dated 23 May 2022.
Accordingly, no additional argument beyond the scope of the
judicial order is attributed to the appellant.
Respondent’s Arguments
The respondent, M/s Cadila Pharmaceuticals Ltd., IGC Samba,
Jammu, was represented through Senior Counsel along with assisting counsel.
The brief order does not separately set out or reproduce the
detailed arguments advanced on behalf of the respondent. The Court, after
hearing counsel for both parties, held that the matter was squarely covered by
its earlier decision.
Accordingly, no argument not expressly recorded in the order
is attributed to the respondent.
Court Order / Findings
The High Court of Jammu & Kashmir and Ladakh recorded the
following findings:
- The
present appeal was similar and identical to several other Excise Appeals
already considered and decided by the Court.
- Those
earlier appeals had been decided through the judgment and order dated 23
May 2022.
- CEA
No. 10/2020 was the leading case in the earlier batch of matters.
- After
hearing counsel for the parties, the Court found that no new ground was
available to the appellant.
- Consequently,
the matter stood squarely covered by the earlier decision.
- The
High Court accordingly dismissed the present appeal.
- The
dismissal was ordered on the same terms and conditions as laid down in the
judgment and order dated 23 May 2022 passed in CEA No. 10/2020 and
connected appeals.
Important Clarification
The present order is a short consequential order and does not
independently reproduce the detailed factual background, statutory controversy,
substantial questions of law, or complete reasoning contained in the earlier
judgment dated 23 May 2022.
The decisive clarification arising from the order is that
where an Excise Appeal is similar and identical to matters already decided by
the same Court, and no new ground is available to the appellant, the Court may
treat the controversy as squarely covered by the earlier binding decision and
dispose of the appeal on the same terms and conditions.
It is also important that the present order should be read together with the judgment and order dated 23 May 2022 in CEA No. 10/2020 and connected appeals for a complete understanding of the underlying controversy, legal reasoning, and applicable terms and conditions.
Link to download the order:
https://www.mytaxexpert.co.in/uploads/1783418781_1451.pdf
Disclaimer
This content is shared strictly for general information and knowledge purposes only. Readers should independently verify the information from reliable sources. It is not intended to provide legal, professional, or advisory guidance. The author and the organisation disclaim all liability arising from the use of this content. The material has been prepared with the assistance of AI tools.
0 Comments
Leave a Comment