Excess Stock Found During GST Survey Cannot Justify Confiscation Under Section 130 – Allahabad High Court | Dinesh Kumar Pradeep Kumar v. Additional Commissioner (2024)

Author
My Tax Expert
12/01/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 412
Read More »
In Dinesh Kumar Pradeep Kumar v. Additional Commissioner Grade-2 & Another, the Allahabad High Court examined the legality of GST proceedings initiated solely on the basis of alleged excess stock found during a su...

Input Tax Credit Cannot Be Denied to Bona Fide Purchaser for Supplier’s GST Default – Tripura High Court in Sahil Enterprises v. Union of India (WP(C) No. 688 of 2022)

Author
My Tax Expert
11/01/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 1154
Read More »
The writ petition before the High Court of Tripura challenged the constitutional validity of Section 16(2)(c) of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 and assailed the order dated 17.05.2022 passed by the Assistan...

Rule 86A Cannot Create Negative Balance in Electronic Credit Ledger: Delhi High Court Restricts Blocking of ITC Beyond Available Credit — Best Crop Science Pvt. Ltd. v. Principal Commissioner, CGST, Meerut (W.P.(C) 10980/2024 & Connected Matters | Delhi High Court)

Author
My Tax Expert
08/01/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 397
Read More »
The batch of writ petitions before the Delhi High Court involved a common controversy concerning the scope and limits of powers exercisable under Rule 86A of the Central Goods and Services Tax Rules, 2017. The petitioner...

GST Recovery Stayed During Statutory Appeal Period: Allahabad High Court Quashes Premature Recovery from Electronic Credit Ledger, M/s S.A.B. Engg Works v. State of U.P. (WRIT TAX No. 2254 of 2025)

Author
My Tax Expert
08/01/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 642
Read More »
The writ petition challenged the action of the tax authorities in forcibly recovering the demand amount from the petitioner’s Electronic Credit Ledger and Electronic Cash Ledger under Section 79 of the CGST Act, 2017.T...

GST Goods Detention for Route Deviation Unsustainable Without Proof of Tax Evasion — Section 129 Penalty Set Aside by Karnataka High Court | M/s. Hysum Steel v. JCCT (Appeals) (2025)

Author
CA. Brijesh Kumar Agrawal
05/01/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 830
Read More »
Goods detention for alleged route deviation despite valid invoice-s.129 penalty set aside for lack of evasion proof KARNATAKA HIGH COURT-M/s. Hysum Steel Versus The Joint Commissioner of Commercial Taxes (Appeal...

Ex-parte GST Adjudication and Cancellation of Registration Set Aside for Violation of Natural Justice — Karnataka High Court | D.V. Constructions v. Union of India (2025)

Author
CA. Brijesh Kumar Agrawal
05/01/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 528
Read More »
Cancellation of GST registration of petitioner - petitioner had failed to file his monthly returns for a continues period of six months - adjudication order passed without granting an opportunity of personal hearing t...

Parallel GST Proceedings Barred under Section 6(2)(b) of CGST Act — Karnataka High Court Quashes State GST Order | M/s. Electronic City Motors v. Union of India (2025)

Author
CA. Brijesh Kumar Agrawal
05/01/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 1176
Read More »
Parallel GST proceedings on same show-cause notice u/s6(2)(b) barred; State GST order quashed, writ allowed.KARNATAKA HIGH COURT- M/s. Electronic City Motors v. Union of India & Ors. Writ Petition No. 7050 of 2025...

Incorrect PIN Code in E-Way Bill Held Minor Error: Allahabad High Court Quashes GST Seizure & Penalty under Section 129 | RC Sales and Services vs State of Uttar Pradesh

Author
My Tax Expert
26/12/2025  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 1003
Read More »
The Allahabad High Court in Rc Sales And Services vs State Of Uttar Pradesh quashed GST seizure and penalty orders under Section 129 of the CGST Act. The court ruled that an incorrect PIN code in the e-way bill constitut...

Blocking of ITC Under Rule 86A Beyond One Year Illegal – Delhi High Court in Sunny Jain v. Union of India

Author
My Tax Expert
22/12/2025  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 708
Read More »
The Delhi High Court examined the legality of repeated and prolonged blocking of Input Tax Credit in the Electronic Credit Ledger under Rule 86A of the CGST Rules, 2017.The Court held that: Blocking of ITC is a drasti...

Section 74 GST Cannot Be Invoked Without Fraud or Suppression – ITC Allowed Despite Supplier Issues | Safecon Lifescience Case

Author
My Tax Expert
22/12/2025  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 774
Read More »
The Allahabad High Court examined the legality of proceedings initiated under Section 74 of the UPGST Act against the petitioner for availing Input Tax Credit on purchases made from a duly registered supplier at the time...