PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (CENTRAL-3) vs ORIENTAL PATHWAYS (NAGPUR) PVT. LTD. | Section 271(1)(c) Penalty on Depreciation Claim under Section 32 – Delhi High Court

Author
My Tax Expert
29/04/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 79
Read More »
Facts of the Case The assessee was engaged in development and operation of highways under BOT model and collected toll revenue. It claimed depreciation @10% on roads under Section 32, which was initiall...

Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax–Central-3 vs Oriental Pathways (Nagpur) Pvt. Ltd. | Delhi High Court | Section 271(1)(c) Penalty on Depreciation Claim under BOT Projects

Author
My Tax Expert
29/04/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 85
Read More »
 Facts of the CaseThe assessee, Oriental Pathways (Nagpur) Pvt. Ltd., was engaged in infrastructure development under the Build-Operate-Transfer (BOT) model, specifically constructing and maintaining highways and ...

PR. Commissioner of Income Tax (Central-3) vs. Sanjeev Dhingra (Delhi High Court, 2018) – Appeal Dismissed Due to Low Tax Effect under CBDT Circular No. 3/2018

Author
My Tax Expert
29/04/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 76
Read More »
 Facts of the CaseThe Revenue filed multiple appeals before the Delhi High Court against the respondent assessee, Sanjeev Dhingra. During the hearing, counsel for the Revenue submitted that the tax effect involve...

Principal Commissioner of Income Tax (Central-3) vs Sanjeev Dhingra (Delhi High Court) – Dismissal of Appeal Due to Low Tax Effect under CBDT Circular No. 3/2018

Author
My Tax Expert
29/04/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 87
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe Revenue filed multiple appeals before the Delhi High Court under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 against the respondent, Sanjeev Dhingra. During the hearing, counsel for the Revenue subm...

The Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax, Central-3 vs Sanjeev Dhingra (Delhi High Court) – Appeal Dismissed Due to Low Tax Effect under CBDT Circular No. 3/2018

Author
My Tax Expert
29/04/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 84
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe Revenue filed multiple appeals before the Delhi High Court against the respondent assessee. During the hearing, counsel for the Revenue submitted that the tax effect involved in each appeal was be...

PR. Commissioner of Income Tax (Central-3) vs Sanjeev Dhingra | Delhi High Court | Low Tax Effect Appeals Dismissed under CBDT Circular No. 3/2018

Author
My Tax Expert
29/04/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 73
Read More »
 Facts of the CaseThe Revenue (Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, Central-3) filed multiple appeals before the Delhi High Court against the respondent, Sanjeev Dhingra. During the hearing, counsel for the Reve...

N.K. Parwanda vs Commissioner of Income Tax | Section 80HHE Deduction on Translation Services as Customized Electronic Data – Delhi High Court (2018)

Author
My Tax Expert
29/04/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 78
Read More »
Facts of the Case The assessee, proprietor of M/s International Academy of Foreign Languages (IAFL), rendered translation and interpretation services to foreign clients via internet. For Assessment Year...

N.K. Parwanda vs Commissioner of Income Tax (Delhi High Court, 2018) – Section 80HHE Deduction on Translation Services as Customized Electronic Data

Author
My Tax Expert
29/04/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 68
Read More »
 Facts of the Case The assessee, proprietor of M/s International Academy of Foreign Languages, provided translation and interpretation services to foreign clients via the internet. For Assessment Y...

N.K. Parwanda vs Commissioner of Income Tax – Deduction under Section 80HHE on Translation Services as Customized Electronic Data (Delhi High Court)

Author
My Tax Expert
29/04/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 67
Read More »
 Facts of the CaseThe assessee, proprietor of M/s International Academy of Foreign Languages, rendered translation and interpretation services to foreign clients via the internet and claimed deduction under Secti...

Principal Commissioner of Income Tax–6 vs M/s Nokia India Pvt. Ltd. (2018) – Allowability of Warranty Provision, Marketing Expenses & Stock Valuation under Section 260A of Income Tax Act

Author
My Tax Expert
29/04/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 54
Read More »
 Facts of the CaseThe appeal was filed by the Revenue under Section 260A against the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal for Assessment Year 2003–04. The dispute revolved around multiple additions and di...