Facts of the
CaseThe appellant-assessee, Aradhana Drinks and
Beverages Pvt. Ltd., filed appeals under Section 260A of the Income Tax
Act, 1961 challenging the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT)
dated 0...
Facts
of the CaseThe
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal had earlier adjudicated cross-appeals filed by
both the Revenue and the assessee through its order dated 22 November 2016.Both
parties challenged the Tribunal’s or...
Facts of the
Case
Search and seizure operations were conducted on 15.02.2014 at
premises connected with the accused persons.
Multiple lockers were discovered, including lockers operated in the
petitione...
Facts of the
CaseThe appellant-assessee, Aradhana Drinks and
Beverages Pvt. Ltd., filed appeals before the Delhi High Court under Section
260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 challenging the order of the Income Tax
Appel...
Facts of the
CaseThe appellant-assessee, Aradhana Drinks and
Beverages Pvt. Ltd., filed appeals under Section 260A of the Income Tax
Act, 1961 challenging the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT)
dated 0...
Facts of the
Case
The assessee, Aradhana Drinks and Beverages Pvt. Ltd., filed
appeals against the ITAT order dated 05.06.2017 for AY 2008-09 and
2009-10.
The Tribunal had remanded issues relating to:
...
Facts of the
CaseThe appellant-assessee, Aradhana Foods and
Juices Pvt. Ltd., filed appeals before the Delhi High Court under Section
260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 challenging the common order of the Income
Tax Ap...
Facts of the
Case
The assessee, Aradhana Foods and Juices Pvt. Ltd., was
engaged in manufacturing and trading of aerated and non-aerated beverages.
The Assessing Officer (AO) made multiple additions:
...
Facts of the
CaseThe Revenue filed appeals against the respondent
assessee, Sindhu Trade Links Ltd., under Income Tax Appeals (ITA Nos. 404/2018
and 456/2018). During the hearing, counsel for the Revenue submitted tha...
Facts of the
CaseThe Revenue preferred appeals before the Delhi High
Court under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act against the respondent assessee,
Sindhu Trade Links Ltd. The appeals involved certain substantial que...