Blog Categories
All Posts
Accounting Standard 9
CBDT 1
Chartered Accountant 1
Chartered Engineer 1
Greetings 1
Income Tax Act 2025 0
Labour Law 2
MCA Notification 1
MSME 1
NGO- Trust & Society 0
PLACEMENT 1
Press Information Bureau, Government of India (PIB) 2
RBI & Banks 1
RERA 0
RTI 1
STUDENT ICAI 1
Virtual Webinar 4
Subscribe to Newsletter
Join our subscribers list to get the latest Tax Updates and Opportunities.
Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax-2 vs Sinosteel India Pvt. Ltd. (Delhi High Court) – Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) in Transfer Pricing Not Leviable on Debatable ALP Issue under Section 92C
Facts of the Case
The
respondent-assessee, Sinosteel India Pvt. Ltd., was engaged in providing
support services to its holding company and associated enterprises for
procurement and supply of metallur...
Late Dinesh Kumar Jain (Through Legal Heir Ankit Jain) vs Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, New Delhi (2018) – Unexplained Cash Deposits under Sections 69 & 69A of Income Tax Act
Facts of the CaseThe appellant, legal heir of Late Dinesh Kumar Jain, challenged
an order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) concerning Assessment Year
2011–12.The Assessing Officer had made an addition of R...
McKinsey Knowledge Centre India Pvt. Ltd. vs Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax, Delhi-6 (Delhi High Court, 2018) – Appeals Dismissed in Cross Matters under Income Tax Act
Facts of the CaseThe matter involves multiple appeals (ITA 526/2017, ITA
590/2017, ITA 82/2018, and connected matters) filed by both the assessee and
the revenue challenging findings of lower authorities.The disputes c...
McKinsey Knowledge Centre India Pvt. Ltd. vs Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax, Delhi-6 (Delhi High Court) – Appeals Dismissed in Cross Matters | ITA 526/2017 & Connected Appeals
Facts of the CaseThe matter pertains to multiple cross appeals filed by both
the assessee (McKinsey Knowledge Centre India Pvt. Ltd.) and the Revenue (Pr.
Commissioner of Income Tax, Delhi-6) before the Delhi High Cour...
M/s McKinsey Knowledge Centre India Pvt. Ltd. vs Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax, Delhi-6 (Delhi High Court, 2018) – Transfer Pricing, KPO vs BPO, Comparable Selection & Notional Interest on Receivables
Facts of the CaseThe assessee, M/s McKinsey Knowledge Centre India Pvt. Ltd.,
is a wholly owned subsidiary of McKinsey Holding Inc., USA, engaged in
providing research & information services and IT support services...
McKinsey Knowledge Centre India Pvt. Ltd. vs Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, Delhi-6 (Delhi High Court, 2018) – Appeals Dismissed in Transfer Pricing / Income Tax Dispute
Facts of the CaseThe present matter concerns a batch of cross-appeals filed
by both the assessee, McKinsey Knowledge Centre India Pvt. Ltd., and the
Revenue, represented by the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, Del...
PR. Commissioner of Income Tax (Central)-2 vs Chintels India Ltd (2018) – Delhi High Court | Low Tax Effect Appeals Dismissed Under CBDT Circular No. 3/2018
Facts of the CaseThe Revenue (Principal Commissioner of Income Tax,
Central-2) filed appeals before the Delhi High Court against the respondent,
Chintels India Ltd. However, during the hearing, the Revenue’s counsel
...
PR. Commissioner of Income Tax (Central)-2 vs Chintels India Ltd | Delhi High Court | Low Tax Effect Appeal Dismissed under CBDT Circular No. 3/2018
Facts of the CaseThe Revenue (Principal Commissioner of Income Tax,
Central-2) filed appeals against the respondent, Chintels India Ltd. However,
during the hearing, counsel for the Revenue submitted that the tax effec...
Ramesh Chandra & Anr. vs Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax (Delhi High Court, 2018) – Reassessment u/s 147/148 Invalid Without Opportunity of Hearing under Section 153(3) Explanation 3
Facts of the
CaseThe petitioners, Ramesh Chandra and Sanjay Chandra,
filed writ petitions challenging reassessment notices and orders issued under
Sections 147/148 of the Income Tax Act for AY 2009–10. The dispute o...
Ramesh Chandra & Anr. vs Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax (2018) – Reassessment Beyond Limitation Without Hearing Held Invalid | Delhi High Court Section 147
Facts of the
CaseThe petitioners, Ramesh Chandra and Sanjay Chandra,
filed writ petitions under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution seeking
quashing of reassessment notice dated 30.03.2017 and order dated 02.05.2...