Facts of the CaseThe dispute pertained to Assessment Year 2005-06. During
assessment proceedings, the Assessing Officer (AO) observed that the assessee
had received a total sum of ₹21,70,34,294/- as advance money tow...
Facts of the CaseThe assessee, engaged in a real estate project, received a
total sum of ₹21,70,34,294 as advance money from 447 parties
towards booking of flats for Assessment Year 2005-06.During assessment proceedi...
Facts of the Case
Property
No. A-35, Mohan Cooperative Industrial Estate, New Delhi, a leasehold
industrial plot, was attached and auctioned by the Tax Recovery Officer
for recovery of income tax dues...
Facts of the Case
The Revenue
preferred an appeal before the Delhi High Court in ITA No. 1638/2010.
During the
proceedings, it was brought to the notice of the Court that the tax effect
involved in...
Facts of the Case
The
Income Tax Department insisted that trust deeds of charitable and
religious trusts must contain an express irrevocability clause.
According
to the Department, such a clause is...
Facts of the CaseThe assessee, Bharat Hotels Limited, was engaged in
the business of owning, operating, running, and managing hotels. The assessee
borrowed funds and utilized those funds for subscribing to the equity c...
Facts of the
CaseA batch of appeals, including ITA No. 742/2008, was
preferred by the Revenue under Section 260A of the Income-tax Act, 1961. During
the hearing, it was noted that the tax effect involved in each of th...
Facts of the
CaseThe Revenue had preferred multiple appeals before
the Delhi High Court challenging orders passed in favour of various assessees
under the Income-tax Act, 1961.At the time of hearing, the Court observe...
Facts of the
Case
The Income Tax Department filed multiple appeals before the Delhi
High Court under Section 260A of the Income-tax Act, 1961.
The appeals involved various assessees and assessment years.
Dur...
Facts of the CaseThe Revenue filed multiple Income Tax Appeals before the Delhi
High Court challenging orders passed in favour of the respective assessees.
During the hearing, the Court examined the tax effect involved...