The Commissioner of Income Tax-II vs. M/s Mahavir Irrigation Pvt. Ltd.: Whether Misclassification of a Non-Refundable Revenue Receipt as a Security Deposit in the Balance Sheet Amounts to Concealment of Income or Furnishing Inaccurate Particulars Under Section 271(1)(c) When Full Disclosures Were Made During Assessment

Author
My Tax Expert
03/06/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 78
Read More »
Facts of the Case Assessee’s Business and Return Filing: The assessee is a private limited company engaged in providing services to obtain orders from Government Departments and acting as a liaison ...

Commissioner of Income Tax, Delhi vs. Ms. Mayawati: Scope of Income Tax Additions Under Sections 68 and 69 for Registered Gifts of Movable and Immovable Properties from Non-Relatives

Author
My Tax Expert
03/06/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 94
Read More »
. Facts of the Case For the Assessment Year (A.Y.) 2003-04, the Respondent-Assessee (Ms. Mayawati) filed her Income Tax return declaring a total income of ₹13,29,090/-. During the scrutiny proces...

Commissioner of Income Tax v. [Assessee Name] — Validity of Scrutiny Notice Service under Section 143(2) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, when Dispatched via Speed Post to a Sufficient Address and Followed by the Mandatory Appearance of the Assessee Before the Assessing Officer

Author
My Tax Expert
03/06/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 82
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe revenue filed an appeal (ITA No. 902/2011) against the assessee before the High Court of Delhi. The central dispute arose regarding the valid service of a statutory notice issued under Section 143(...

Commissioner of Income Tax vs. Brahmaputra Consortium Ltd. | Penalty under Section 271(1)(c) Cannot Be Levied for Bona Fide Excess Depreciation Claim and Debatable ROC Fee Deduction Claim – Delhi High Court

Author
My Tax Expert
03/06/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 70
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe assessee, Brahmaputra Consortium Ltd., filed its return for Assessment Year 2001-02 declaring a loss of ₹93,74,724.During assessment proceedings, the Assessing Officer noticed the following claim...

Commissioner of Income Tax v. Assessee (Name Not Available in Uploaded Order) – Delhi High Court Dismisses Revenue Appeals on Low Tax Effect Threshold | ITA Nos. 74/2008, 285/2008, 312/2008, 510/2008, 512/2008, 637/2008, 976/2008, 1339/2008, 76/2009 & 849/2009

Author
My Tax Expert
03/06/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 67
Read More »
Facts of the CaseMultiple Income Tax Appeals were filed by the Revenue before the Delhi High Court.The Court examined the monetary impact involved in the appeals.It was found that the tax effect in the concerned matter...

Asian Paints Ltd. v. DCIT – ITAT Mumbai Quashes Section 263 Revision; Difference of Opinion with Assessing Officer Not Sufficient to Invoke Revisional Jurisdiction

Author
My Tax Expert
03/06/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 80
Read More »
Facts of the CaseDuring scrutiny assessment proceedings, the Assessing Officer issued notices under Sections 142(1) and 143(2) seeking detailed explanations regarding: Deduction claimed under Section 80M; Pr...

Commissioner of Income Tax-V, New Delhi vs. Navin Chemicals Manufacturing Co. Ltd. | Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) for Bogus Business Expenditure Claims and Furnishing Inaccurate Particulars

Author
My Tax Expert
03/06/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 63
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe assessee company, Navin Chemicals Manufacturing Co. Ltd., was engaged in the manufacture of chemical formulations. However, all manufacturing and business operations had remained suspended since 19...

Commissioner of Income Tax vs Assessee Company – Allowability of Prior Period Interest Expenditure and Crystallized Liability Under Mercantile System | Delhi High Court

Author
My Tax Expert
03/06/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 66
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe assessee filed its return of income for Assessment Year 1998-99.During assessment proceedings, the Assessing Officer made two additions: Disallowance of prior period interest expenditure am...

Commissioner of Income Tax vs Assessee – Withdrawal of Income Tax Appeals Before Delhi High Court in ITA Nos. 1016, 1017 & 1020 of 2009

Author
My Tax Expert
03/06/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 65
Read More »
Facts of the Case ITA Nos. 1016, 1017 and 1020 of 2009 were listed before the Delhi High Court. The appellant/assessee, through its counsel, requested permission to withdraw the appeals. The ...

Commissioner of Income Tax vs Assessee (Name Not Reflected in Order) – ITA No. 931/2011 | Delhi High Court Dismisses Income Tax Appeal as Withdrawn

Author
My Tax Expert
03/06/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 56
Read More »
Facts of the CaseAn appeal bearing ITA No. 931/2011 was pending before the Delhi High Court. At the time of hearing, counsel for the appellant requested permission to withdraw the appeal. The Court accepted the request...