Reassessment Cannot Be Based Solely on DVO Report: Delhi High Court Quashes Section 148 Notices in Divine Infracon Pvt. Ltd. v. DCIT (2024)

Author
My Tax Expert
04/02/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 299
Read More »
Facts of the CaseDivine Infracon Private Limited, the petitioner, is engaged in the business of real estate development and hospitality. A search and seizure operation under Section 132(1) of the Income-tax Act was c...

Reassessment Notices Issued Post Abhisar Buildwell Barred by Limitation: Delhi High Court Quashes Section 148 Proceedings in Dharampal Satyapal Ltd. v. DCIT (2024)

Author
My Tax Expert
04/02/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 395
Read More »
Facts of the CaseDharampal Satyapal Ltd. (DSL), the petitioner, is the successor entity of Abhisar Buildwell Pvt. Ltd. (ABPL) pursuant to a court-approved scheme of arrangement. ABPL had been subjected to a search an...

Disallowance of WIP Out of Disclosed On-Money Not Sustainable – Section 40A(3) Cannot Lead to Double Taxation; Unsecured Loan Through Banking Channel Not Taxable u/s 68 | Shanti Developers v. DCIT (ITAT Rajkot)

Author
CA. Vivek kr. Jain
04/02/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 859
Read More »
Shanti Developers v. Deputy Commissioner of Income-tax ITA Nos. 827/RJT/2024 & 274/RJT/2025 (AY 2011–12)ITAT Rajkot BenchDecision dated: 28 January 2026Coram: Dr. Arjun Lal Saini (AM) & Dinesh Mohan S...

Interest Under Section 234B Payable Only up to Admission of Settlement Application: Delhi High Court Upholds Brij Lal Principle in CIT (Central)-III v. Income Tax Settlement Commission (2024)

Author
My Tax Expert
04/02/2026  |  1 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 468
Read More »
Facts of the CaseA search and seizure operation under Section 132 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 was conducted in the Radico Khaitan Group, in which the respondent-assessee, Dalip Kumar Banthiya, was the Chief Financial...

Assessment and Reassessment in the Name of Amalgamating Company Held Void Ab Initio: Delhi High Court Applies Maruti Suzuki Doctrine in BSBK Engineers Pvt. Ltd. v. ACIT (2024)

Author
My Tax Expert
04/02/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 375
Read More »
Facts of the CaseBSBK Engineers Private Limited is the resulting company pursuant to a court-approved Scheme of Amalgamation under which Parishudh Finance Company Pvt. Ltd., the amalgamating company, stood merged and...

Assessment and Reassessment Against Amalgamating Companies Are Jurisdictionally Invalid: Delhi High Court Reaffirms Maruti Suzuki Principle in BSBK Engineers Pvt. Ltd. v. ACIT (2024)

Author
My Tax Expert
04/02/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 379
Read More »
Facts of the CaseBSBK Engineers Private Limited is the resulting company pursuant to a court-approved Scheme of Amalgamation under which Parishudh Finance Company Pvt. Ltd., the amalgamating company, stood merged and...

Reassessment Notices Barred by Limitation After Abhisar Buildwell: Delhi High Court Quashes Section 148 Proceedings in Bhadani Financers Pvt. Ltd. v. ACIT (2024)

Author
My Tax Expert
04/02/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 325
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe petitioner, Bhadani Financers Pvt. Ltd., was subjected to reassessment proceedings through issuance of a notice under Section 148 in November 2023 for a completed/unabated assessment year.Earlier...

Reassessment Notices Invalid Without Proper Sanction Under Section 151: Delhi High Court Quashes Section 148 Proceedings in Atma Ram Singhania v. ACIT (2024)

Author
My Tax Expert
04/02/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 470
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe petitioner, Atma Ram Singhania, along with other connected assessees, challenged reassessment proceedings initiated for Assessment Year 2015-16 through notices issued under Section 148 of the Inc...

Delhi High Court Reaffirms Mandatory Nature of Draft Assessment Order Under Section 144C – AT Kearney India Pvt. Ltd. v. DCIT (2024)

Author
My Tax Expert
04/02/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 385
Read More »
Facts of the CaseAT Kearney India Private Limited (“the Petitioner”) was subjected to assessment proceedings involving transfer pricing adjustments. The Transfer Pricing Officer (TPO) passed an order proposing ad...

Reassessment Notices Barred by Limitation Post Abhisar Buildwell: Delhi High Court Quashes Section 148 Proceedings in ARN Infrastructures India Ltd. v. ACIT

Author
My Tax Expert
04/02/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 421
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe petitioner, ARN Infrastructures India Limited, challenged multiple reassessment proceedings initiated for various assessment years by issuance of notices under Section 148 in November 2023 and Ma...